2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress update from the hippocampal subfields group

Abstract: Introduction Heterogeneity of segmentation protocols for medial temporal lobe regions and hippocampal subfields on in vivo magnetic resonance imaging hinders the ability to integrate findings across studies. We aim to develop a harmonized protocol based on expert consensus and histological evidence. Methods Our international working group, funded by the EU Joint Programme–Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND), is working toward the product… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of studies utilize a single measure of memory or cognition, reducing the reliability, robustness, and generalizability of these constructs. Furthermore, because a unified protocol for measuring hippocampal and subfield volume has not been fully developed (see Olsen et al, in press; Wisse et al, ), prior studies have measured MTL volume based on different protocols and criteria, introducing uncontrolled error variance across studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of studies utilize a single measure of memory or cognition, reducing the reliability, robustness, and generalizability of these constructs. Furthermore, because a unified protocol for measuring hippocampal and subfield volume has not been fully developed (see Olsen et al, in press; Wisse et al, ), prior studies have measured MTL volume based on different protocols and criteria, introducing uncontrolled error variance across studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, using structural equation modeling, we aim to investigate whether these structural measures mediate the relationship between age and memory and gauge the extent to which various models of structural connectivity may differentially account for potentially mediated relationships. In an attempt to overcome some of the weaknesses in the current literature, we utilize a harmonized hippocampal subfield segmentation protocol developed across several labs (Olsen et al, in press; Wisse et al, ), and implement multiple measurments of memory to increase the generalizability of our findings. Based on the prior literature, we hypothesize that hippocampal subfield volume and measures of fornix white matter microstructure will show negative associations with age, with the ERC exhibiting the weakest relationship, and fornix diffusion the strongest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, some mild variability in correlation and accuracy versus manual segmentations is expected. Certain hippocampal boundaries (specifically along the head and the tail) are only visible in high-resolution MRIs and consensus on rules for delineating the boundaries of these regions on an MRI has not yet been reached (Olsen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, we find that the posterior SUB region in humans contains two distinct complementary gene hippocampal boundaries is highly inconsistent across studies 22,23 . Due to the difficulty of drawing hippocampal boundaries on relatively homogenous MRI contrast, the current consensus among the community is to follow geometrical selection guidelines [24][25][26][27][28][29] . However, a gene-expression based atlas could provide insight as to mechanistic and cell type-specific architecture of the hippocampus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%