2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.701787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress towards a high-resolution retinal prosthesis

Abstract: Electronic retinal prostheses represent a potentially effective approach for restoring some degree of sight in blind patients with retinal degeneration. Functional restoration of sight would require hundreds to thousands of electrodes effectively stimulating remaining neurons in the retina. We present a design of an optoelectronic retinal prosthetic system having 3mm diameter retinal implant with pixel sizes down to 25 micrometers, which allows for natural eye scanning for observing a large field of view, as w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, our organic photovoltaic device proved to possess a remarkable light-sensitivity, with a response threshold of 0.3 μW/mm 2 , 30-fold lower than the ocular safety limit for continuous exposure to visible light (106.93 μW/mm 2 ), and a response saturation at 100 μW/mm 2 , still below the limit. Moreover, the response threshold closely matched the range (0.1-10 μW/mm 2 ) of retinal irradiance during common daily outdoor activity 41,42 , thus suggesting a possible future implementation without any external light projectors. Another interesting feature of our interface is related to the linear dynamic range of operation covering 2 log units of retinal irradiation (1-100 μW/mm 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Interestingly, our organic photovoltaic device proved to possess a remarkable light-sensitivity, with a response threshold of 0.3 μW/mm 2 , 30-fold lower than the ocular safety limit for continuous exposure to visible light (106.93 μW/mm 2 ), and a response saturation at 100 μW/mm 2 , still below the limit. Moreover, the response threshold closely matched the range (0.1-10 μW/mm 2 ) of retinal irradiance during common daily outdoor activity 41,42 , thus suggesting a possible future implementation without any external light projectors. Another interesting feature of our interface is related to the linear dynamic range of operation covering 2 log units of retinal irradiation (1-100 μW/mm 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%