“…Obviously the nonlinear gauge symmetry (1.3) does not lend itself to an appropriate starting point for this task, the conditions for supergravity being not inherent in general gPSM theories: Any strategy must -in some sense-contain the restriction known in supergravity models from superspace or from a gauge-theoretic approach that, in the limit of flat space-time of the bosonic geometry, the fermionic sector must reduce to rigid supersymmetry [8][9][10][11]42]. In a generic PSM the bosonic potential need not have any flat space-time limit and thus a generalization covering also those geometries is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include effective theories of direct physical interest, like reduced d-dimensional Einstein theories and the extensions thereof (Einstein-deSitter, Jordan-Brans-Dicke theories [1][2][3][4][5]), but also theories suggested by stringy arguments [6] 1 . On the other hand, supersymmetric extensions of gravity [8][9][10][11] are believed to be a crucial ingredient for a consistent solution of the problem how to quantize gravity in the framework of string/brane theory [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jackiw-Teitelboim model [32][33][34][35][36] corresponds to 8) and the bosonic part of the simplest non-trivial 2d supergravity model of Howe [37] -after the correct identification of the dilaton with one of the components of the superfield [38]becomes…”
Fermionic extensions of generic 2d gravity theories obtained from the graded Poisson-Sigma model (gPSM) approach show a large degree of ambiguity. In addition, obstructions may reduce the allowed range of fields as given by the bosonic theory, or even prohibit any extension in certain cases. In our present work we relate the finite W-algebras inherent in the gPSM algebra of constraints to algebras which can be interpreted as supergravities in the usual sense (Neuveu-Schwarz or Ramond algebras resp.), deformed by the presence of the dilaton field. With very straightforward and natural assumptions on them -like demanding rigid supersymmetry in a certain flat limit, or linking the anti-commutator of certain fermionic charges to the Hamiltonian constraint-in the "genuine" supergravity obtained in this way the ambiguities disappear, as well as the obstructions referred to above. Thus all especially interesting bosonic models (spherically reduced gravity, the Jackiw-Teitelboim model etc.) under these conditions possess a unique fermionic extension and are free from new singularities. The superspace supergravity model of Howe is found as a special case of this supergravity action. For this class of models the relation between bosonic potential and prepotential does not introduce obstructions as well.
“…Obviously the nonlinear gauge symmetry (1.3) does not lend itself to an appropriate starting point for this task, the conditions for supergravity being not inherent in general gPSM theories: Any strategy must -in some sense-contain the restriction known in supergravity models from superspace or from a gauge-theoretic approach that, in the limit of flat space-time of the bosonic geometry, the fermionic sector must reduce to rigid supersymmetry [8][9][10][11]42]. In a generic PSM the bosonic potential need not have any flat space-time limit and thus a generalization covering also those geometries is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include effective theories of direct physical interest, like reduced d-dimensional Einstein theories and the extensions thereof (Einstein-deSitter, Jordan-Brans-Dicke theories [1][2][3][4][5]), but also theories suggested by stringy arguments [6] 1 . On the other hand, supersymmetric extensions of gravity [8][9][10][11] are believed to be a crucial ingredient for a consistent solution of the problem how to quantize gravity in the framework of string/brane theory [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jackiw-Teitelboim model [32][33][34][35][36] corresponds to 8) and the bosonic part of the simplest non-trivial 2d supergravity model of Howe [37] -after the correct identification of the dilaton with one of the components of the superfield [38]becomes…”
Fermionic extensions of generic 2d gravity theories obtained from the graded Poisson-Sigma model (gPSM) approach show a large degree of ambiguity. In addition, obstructions may reduce the allowed range of fields as given by the bosonic theory, or even prohibit any extension in certain cases. In our present work we relate the finite W-algebras inherent in the gPSM algebra of constraints to algebras which can be interpreted as supergravities in the usual sense (Neuveu-Schwarz or Ramond algebras resp.), deformed by the presence of the dilaton field. With very straightforward and natural assumptions on them -like demanding rigid supersymmetry in a certain flat limit, or linking the anti-commutator of certain fermionic charges to the Hamiltonian constraint-in the "genuine" supergravity obtained in this way the ambiguities disappear, as well as the obstructions referred to above. Thus all especially interesting bosonic models (spherically reduced gravity, the Jackiw-Teitelboim model etc.) under these conditions possess a unique fermionic extension and are free from new singularities. The superspace supergravity model of Howe is found as a special case of this supergravity action. For this class of models the relation between bosonic potential and prepotential does not introduce obstructions as well.
“…The EFE for these theories are given by 14) where the quintessence field energy-momentum tensor and the field equation of motion become 15) and 16) respectively. Thus, whenever the potential is flat enough so that the field is slowly rolling down, the scalar field can drive a period of accelerated expansion.…”
Section: Quintessencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both points of view are mathematically equivalent since geometrical modifications can be interpreted as curvature fluids and hence interpreted as DE contributions. Some examples of this include minimally-coupled models of scalar fields known as quintessence [5] or more general K-essence models [6], Lovelock theories [7], Gauss-Bonnet theories [8], scalar-tensor theories like Brans-Dicke [9][10][11] or more general models [12], vector-tensor theories [13], gravitational theories derived from extra dimensional models [14]; supergravity models [15], disformal theories [16] or models with either quantumgravity-induced violation or deformation of Lorentz symmetry and models of gravity breaking CPT [17]. In fact, the so-called f (R) theories [18], where the usual Einstein-Hilbert gravitational action is replaced by a more general f (R) term, can be understood as a kind of scalar-tensor theory.…”
Abstract. One possible explanation for the present observed acceleration of the Universe is the breakdown of homogeneity and isotropy due to the formation of non-linear structures. How inhomogeneities affect the averaged cosmological expansion rate and lead to late-time acceleration is generally considered to be due to some backreaction mechanism. In the recent literature most averaging calculations have focused their attention on General Relativity together with pressure-free matter. In this communication we focus our attention on more general scenarios, including imperfect fluids as well as alternative theories of gravity, and apply an averaging procedure to them in order to determine possible backreaction effects. For illustrative purposes, we present our results for dark energy models, quintessence and Brans-Dicke theories. We also provide a discussion about the limitations of frame choices in the averaging procedure.
The text is an essentially self‐contained introduction to four‐dimensional N = 1 supergravity, including its couplings to super Yang‐Mills and chiral matter multiplets, for readers with basic knowledge of standard gauge theories and general relativity. Emphasis is put on showing how supergravity fits in the general framework of gauge theories and how it can be derived from a tensor calculus for gauge theories of a standard form.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.