Progress in Tokamak exhaust processing technology

Liangping, 熊亮萍 Xiong; Sheng, 胡胜 Hu; Jingwei, 侯京伟 Hou; Yu, 龚宇 Gong

doi:10.3788/hplpb20152701.16009

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By comparing the thermal conductivity values of the most widely distributed dolomite, limestone, mudstone and siltstone in Guizhou with similar rock types in the north [17], northwest [18], and southeast [10] parts of China (Table 2), it is found that the thermal conductivity of dolomite, limestone and mudstone from Guizhou is very close to that of rocks from the north of China, with differences of less than 10%. However, they show quite large differences with those from northwest and southeast China, where the Guizhou dolomites show thermal conductivities higher than those from the northwest and southeast, while the Guizhou mudstone thermal conductivity values are lower than those from the northwest and southeast.…”

Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…During the past 30 years, research has been carried out on the thermophysical properties of rocks at the regional scale of northwest China, north China and southeast China within the context of gas, oil, and geothermal energyexploration [7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, no research in relation to the Guizhou Province or even southwest China in general has been carried out to the authors' knowledge.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of the Thermophysical Properties and Influencing Factors of Various Rock Types From the Guizhou Province

Song

Jiang

Peiwen³

2018

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A series of analyses have been carried out on a number of rock types from the Guizhou Province to investigate their thermophysical properties. A total of 433 samples from 14 types of rock were collected, tested and analyzed. It was found that in this province, the average thermal conductivity of the samples ranged between 1.516±0.264 and 5.066±0.521 W/(m·K), the average specific heat capacity varied from 0.272±0.042 to 0.603±0.096 kJ/(kg·°C), and the average thermal diffusion coefficients were from 0.752±0.331 to 2.854±0.368 MJ/(m3·K). The older rocks always had higher thermal conductivity and thermal diffusion. Thermal conductivity and thermal diffusion of rocks are positively correlated with the mineral content of high thermal conductivity species, but the situation for the specific heat capacity is the opposite. With increasing mineral particle size, the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusion coefficient also increase, but the relationship with specific heat capacity is not obvious. The thermal conductivity and thermal diffusion coefficient of rocks increases under water saturated conditions compared to dry conditions, but the specific heat capacity decreases.

show abstract

Section: Thermal Conductivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%