2014
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/54/7/073015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in the physics basis of a Fusion Nuclear Science Facility based on the Advanced Tokamak concept

Abstract: Physics based integrated modelling of the baseline scenario for a Fusion Nuclear Science Facility based on the Advanced Tokamak concept (FNSF-AT) (Chan et al 2010 Fusion Sci. Technol. 57 66) has found steady-state equilibria with good stability and controllability properties at the fusion performance required to accomplish FNSF's nuclear science mission with margin. 2D divertor analysis for this baseline scenario predicts that peak heat flux <10 MW m−2 can be obtained even with scrape-off layer power width ∼1 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the United States, the original ARIES design [9] has been updated with various 'Advanced and Conservative Tokamak' (ACT) versions [21], while proposals are also made for more compact lower power designs with ARC [22] and ST Pilot Plant [23] facilities. In addition, the AT forms the basis for various proposed fusion nuclear science testing facilities such as the Fusion Development Facility (FDF) [24] and Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) [25][26][27] in the United States, and the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, the original ARIES design [9] has been updated with various 'Advanced and Conservative Tokamak' (ACT) versions [21], while proposals are also made for more compact lower power designs with ARC [22] and ST Pilot Plant [23] facilities. In addition, the AT forms the basis for various proposed fusion nuclear science testing facilities such as the Fusion Development Facility (FDF) [24] and Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF) [25][26][27] in the United States, and the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 A Fusion Nuclear Science Facility design (FNSF-AT) uses q min > 1:4 with strong negative central shear at b N ¼ 3:7. 7 The ARIES-AT design uses q min ¼ 2:4 and b N ¼ 5:4. 8 All of these designs are based on several predicted advantages for steady-state operation at high q min .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work presents the modeling investigation and planned experimental validation of a non-standard ECCD technique -top launch ECCD. Comparisons of top launch and conventional outside launch ECCD modelled for DEMO [9] and FNSF-AT [10] suggest that the top launch approach can substantially increase the interactions of EC waves with higher energy electrons and thus the ECCD efficiency at mid-radius. We consistently find 35% or more improvement in ECCD efficiency for CFETR [11] baseline scenario and even higher increases for some cases on the DIII-D tokamak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%