2008
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in the multidisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and the impact on clinical practice: perioperative management of rectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, HR MRI provides the information needed to stratify patients into 2 groups: good prognosis or poor prognosis. The standardized HR MRI report should include the following information for further discussion by the MDT: (1) the potential involvement of the CMR, (2) depth of tumor spread beyond the muscularis propria, (3) nodal status, (4) the presence of extramural vascular invasion, and (5) the commitment of the puborectalis sling muscle [ 13 , 15 ] . Patients with a good prognosis are selected for primary surgery, i.e.…”
Section: Hr Mri: Stratification Of Patients With Rectal Cancer Accordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, HR MRI provides the information needed to stratify patients into 2 groups: good prognosis or poor prognosis. The standardized HR MRI report should include the following information for further discussion by the MDT: (1) the potential involvement of the CMR, (2) depth of tumor spread beyond the muscularis propria, (3) nodal status, (4) the presence of extramural vascular invasion, and (5) the commitment of the puborectalis sling muscle [ 13 , 15 ] . Patients with a good prognosis are selected for primary surgery, i.e.…”
Section: Hr Mri: Stratification Of Patients With Rectal Cancer Accordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…total mesorectal excision (TME), with a 5-year survival rate of 85–90% [ 13 ] . Tumors presenting the following features are considered to have a good prognosis: (1) potentially negative CRM (>1 mm), (2) T1–T2 or T3 tumors with extramural extension <5 mm, (3) absence of extramural vascular invasion, (4) N0/N1, (5) tumors located in the middle or upper third [ 13 , 15 ] . Patients with a poor prognosis include the following: patients with tumors with a low risk of local recurrence because of a free CRM, but increased risk of systemic failure.…”
Section: Hr Mri: Stratification Of Patients With Rectal Cancer Accordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may make TME easier to perform, reducing the risk of local recurrence and result in a better prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy will also reduce T staging for rectal cancer patients with phase II with local infiltration in addition to reducing T stage of phase III patients and regional lymph nodes to reduce N staging (Cervantes et al 2008;Huang et al 2001;Ceelen et al 2009;Soumarova et al 2009). …”
Section: Combined Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Or Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotherapy before operation: Short duration radiotherapy (5 days) with total dosage of 25 Gy (Cervantes et al 2008;Roohipour et al 2008;Sebag-Montefiore et al 2009;Siegel et al 2009) for rectal cancer and regional lymph nodes with radical surgery performed at days 1-7 after radiotherapy improves the risk of local recurrence. However, short-course radiotherapy will make the surgery technically more difficult, increasing the probability of anastomotic leakage, which should be monitored carefully (Vermaas et al 2007) (2b evidence, level B recommendation).…”
Section: Combined Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Or Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the fi rst therapeutic intervention for dealing with oncological processes has been greatly infl uenced by the referring services that are specifi c to the particular healthcare centre involved. Today, no one questions that the therapeutic decisions for dealing with rectal cancer should be taken by a multidisciplinary group, irrespective of the patient's point of entry to the health-care system, and on the basis of agreed protocols [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%