2019
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201806545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in the Development of Fe‐Based PGM‐Free Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Abstract: Development of alternative energy sources is crucial to tackle challenges encountered by the growing global energy demand. Hydrogen-fuel, a promising way to store energy produced from renewable power sources, can be converted into electrical energy at high efficiency via direct electrochemical conversion in fuel cells, releasing water as the sole byproduct. One important drawback to current fuel-cell technology is the high content of platinum-group-metal (PGM) electrocatalysts required to perform the sluggish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
304
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(310 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
4
304
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and ultimately possibly resulting in the formation of volatile carbon corrosion products, CO and CO 2 , leading in this case to metal leaching via destruction of MN x sites (irreversible degradation). More recently, using a kinetic model describing the degradation rate of PGM‐free ORR catalysts, Yin and Zelenay and Martinez et al . confirmed that peroxide and/or peroxide derived radicals are likely responsible for the performance loss in PEMFC devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and ultimately possibly resulting in the formation of volatile carbon corrosion products, CO and CO 2 , leading in this case to metal leaching via destruction of MN x sites (irreversible degradation). More recently, using a kinetic model describing the degradation rate of PGM‐free ORR catalysts, Yin and Zelenay and Martinez et al . confirmed that peroxide and/or peroxide derived radicals are likely responsible for the performance loss in PEMFC devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This traditional synthesis concept has primarily limited the improvement of catalyst performance due to poor control of the catalyst morphology and the local structure of the active sites. Because of the complex synthesis procedures, the nature of such MN 4 active sites and their formation mechanisms have remained elusive for several decades …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single atomic (SA) iron coordinated nitrogen (Fe‐N x ) moieties in the carbon matrix are commonly recognized as active centers for catalyzing sluggish ORR kinetics . Currently reported strategies for synthesizing Fe‐N‐C electrocatalysts unavoidably involve high‐temperature pyrolysis of Fe‐ and N‐containing precursors . However, during the thermal pyrolysis, Fe species tend to agglomerate and eventually form low‐active Fe‐based clusters and nanoparticles encapsulated in carbon shells (e.g., Fe 3 C@C NPs), which are difficult to be removed and thus seriously block the formation active Fe‐N x moieties (generally, SA Fe content in Fe‐N‐C is <1.0 wt%) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Currently reported strategies for synthesizing Fe-N-C electrocatalysts unavoidably involve high-temperature pyrolysis of Fe-and N-containing precursors. [18,19] However, during the thermal pyrolysis, Fe species tend to agglomerate and eventually form low-active Fe-based clusters and nanoparticles encapsulated in carbon shells (e.g., Fe 3 C@C NPs), which are difficult to be removed and thus seriously block the formation active Fe-N x moieties (generally, SA Fe content in Fe-N-C is <1.0 wt%). [20,21] Additionally, a large amount of Fe-N x moieties encapsulated in the carbon matrix cannot participate in the ORR process as a result of their inaccessibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%