1999
DOI: 10.1115/1.3098933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in Structural Dynamics With Stochastic Parameter Variations: 1987-1998

Abstract: This article is an update of an earlier paper by Ibrahim (1987) and is aimed at reviewing the work published during the last decade in the area of vibration of structures with parameter uncertainties. Different types of uncertainty modeling are described in terms of material and geometric properties. These models are considered in terms of Gaussian or non-Gaussian distributions. Computational stochastic algorithms including stochastic finite element methods and Monte Carlo simulation are dominating a major par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These random variables are usually chosen as the composite laminate mechanical properties, density, and orientation angles. Ibrahim [2] and Manohar and Ibrahim [3] has presented a review of structural dynamics problems with such stochastic parameter variations. Oh and Librescu [4] developed a meancentered second-moment method to study the free vibration and reliability of composite cantilevers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These random variables are usually chosen as the composite laminate mechanical properties, density, and orientation angles. Ibrahim [2] and Manohar and Ibrahim [3] has presented a review of structural dynamics problems with such stochastic parameter variations. Oh and Librescu [4] developed a meancentered second-moment method to study the free vibration and reliability of composite cantilevers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work is motivated by some recent results on the sensitivity and variability of the response of structural stochasticity (see, for example, Manohar andIbrahim, 1999) and by the recent assessment of joint uncertainties by . These problems are complex in nature because every joint involves different sources of uncertainty and non-smooth nonlinear characteristics.…”
Section: State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This constitutes the basis of the subject of stochastic finite element method (SFEM). Discussions and literature review on the various methods of random field discretization and weak form representations are available in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. An important issue in most SFEM studies is that the random field descriptions are limited to second-order characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%