2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in research on site-specific nutrient management for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During recent decades, an approach termed site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) was designed aiming to increase the nutrient-use efficiency of major nutrients, such as N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), and to generate field-specific fertilizer recommendations ( Chivenge et al, 2022 ). The SSNM is a dynamic, generally plant-based, soil and crop growth season-specific nutrient management approach which intends to synchronize nutrient provision and demand based on the differences in plant requirements, indigenous nutrient provision, and nutrient recovery from applied fertilizers and other resources ( Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Toward Better N Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During recent decades, an approach termed site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) was designed aiming to increase the nutrient-use efficiency of major nutrients, such as N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), and to generate field-specific fertilizer recommendations ( Chivenge et al, 2022 ). The SSNM is a dynamic, generally plant-based, soil and crop growth season-specific nutrient management approach which intends to synchronize nutrient provision and demand based on the differences in plant requirements, indigenous nutrient provision, and nutrient recovery from applied fertilizers and other resources ( Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Toward Better N Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For N fertilizer inputs, SSNM determines the optimum amount of fertilizer that is required to be applied, and further calculates the balanced supply throughout the crop growing season to synchronize the peak demands for N by the plant, depending on the needs of crop varietal types, soil texture and structure, and variations in the environmental conditions ( Peng et al, 2010 ). Further approaches, including leaf color charts, can also be utilized for additional in-season modifications of the projected N amendments, therefore empowering further tweaking against the actual crop growth conditions ( Chivenge et al, 2022 ). SSNM was initially conceived in Asia for smallholder rice producers, where field occupations tend to be small with large spatial variabilities regarding the soil nutrient statuses and management.…”
Section: Toward Better N Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Saito et al (2021) defined agronomic gain in yield as the difference in yield between improved agronomic practices such as alternate nutrient, water, and weed managements, and/or their combinations and the control, which can be typical farmers’ practices, recommended practices, or practices having no input (e.g., no applied fertilizer). Several review papers have summarized impact of improved agronomic practices on agronomic gain in yield in SSA ( Chivenge et al, 2021 , Chivenge et al, 2022 , Ibrahim et al, 2021 , Saito et al, 2021 ). For instance, integrated crop management practices for irrigated rice systems showed yield gain from 1.6 to 3.1 t/ha ( Saito et al, 2021 ), while improved nutrient management has resulted in agronomic gain in yield from 0.4 to 2.9 t/ha ( Ibrahim et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In combination with other agronomic practices, the use of mineral fertilisers is considered indispensable for closing yield gaps (Chivenge et al, 2022;Van Ittersum et al, 2016;. The average fertiliser use in SSA is about 20 kg ha -1 , which is very low compared to the global average of 137 kg ha -1 , although large differences among and within countries in SSA can be found (Sheahan and Barrett, 2017;Vanlauwe and Dobermann, 2020;World Bank, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average fertiliser use in SSA is about 20 kg ha -1 , which is very low compared to the global average of 137 kg ha -1 , although large differences among and within countries in SSA can be found (Sheahan and Barrett, 2017;Vanlauwe and Dobermann, 2020;World Bank, 2022). The limited use of fertilisers has several causes, such as high costs and limited access (Chivenge et al, 2022). Furthermore, a strong driver for the use of fertilisers is their profitability, which depends on the crop response to fertilisation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%