40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit 2004
DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-3786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress In NEXT Ion Optics Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of plasma flow in ion optics renders particle-in-cell (PIC) [1] based models, which simulate a collisionless plasma by solving plasma particle trajectories, space charge, and the electric field self-consistently as the most appropriate approach for ion optics modeling. Numerous PIC-based ion optics simulation codes have been developed (see, for example, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and references therein). Whereas earlier studies have focused on the physics of a single beamlet, recent studies have also begun to use ion optics models to predict the behavior of entire ion optics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of plasma flow in ion optics renders particle-in-cell (PIC) [1] based models, which simulate a collisionless plasma by solving plasma particle trajectories, space charge, and the electric field self-consistently as the most appropriate approach for ion optics modeling. Numerous PIC-based ion optics simulation codes have been developed (see, for example, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] and references therein). Whereas earlier studies have focused on the physics of a single beamlet, recent studies have also begun to use ion optics models to predict the behavior of entire ion optics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model presented in this work is an axisymmetric simulation of a single ion optics aperture. This model has been under development for several years, 9 and has previously been applied to both the NSTAR 10 and NEXT [11][12][13] ion engines. The simulation is applied to NEXT in this work, with the goal of comparing simulated performance and erosion to the experimentally measured data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, cyclic life testing was performed on the neutralizer heater design for the International Space Station (ISS) Plasma Contactor hollow cathode assembly. 39,40 These heaters were validated to have a B 10 life of approximately 6700 cycles (this corresponds to the cycles at which 10 % of the population of heaters would fail). The NSTAR heaters were the same design and from the same manufacturer as the tested hollow cathode assembly heaters, so cyclic testing was not needed to demonstrate that they met the NSTAR requirements.…”
Section: Swaged Heater Cyclic Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different computer software models, such as CEX3D 44 , CEX2D 44 , ffx 11 , erode 10 , and MICHELLE 45 , have been used to examine NEXT accelerator grid erosion. Table 3 shows the pit and groove penetration of the NEXT accelerator grid based on predictions from the codes and an extrapolation of the NEXT LDT and 2000 hour wear test results.…”
Section: Previous Computer Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%