2014
DOI: 10.5194/bg-11-4357-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in DGVMs: a comment on "Impacts of trait variation through observed trait–climate relationships on performance of an Earth system model: a conceptual analysis" by Verheijen et al. (2013)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent forest carbon density map (Thurner et al, 2014) for Northern Hemisphere boreal and temperate forests (30-80 • N), derived from radar remote sensing of growing-stock volume (GSV), was used to evaluate modeled forest biomass. For soil carbon stocks, the simulated soil carbon density was compared with the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD; 0-1 m depth, FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, 2012) and the Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD; Hugelius et al, 2013). Since the model results for soil carbon are not fully comparable to NCSCD due to lack of peatland carbon accumulation and cryoturbation processes in ORC-HL, metrics were not applied to soil carbon for establishing a model score.…”
Section: Evaluation Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent forest carbon density map (Thurner et al, 2014) for Northern Hemisphere boreal and temperate forests (30-80 • N), derived from radar remote sensing of growing-stock volume (GSV), was used to evaluate modeled forest biomass. For soil carbon stocks, the simulated soil carbon density was compared with the Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD; 0-1 m depth, FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, 2012) and the Northern Circumpolar Soil Carbon Database (NCSCD; Hugelius et al, 2013). Since the model results for soil carbon are not fully comparable to NCSCD due to lack of peatland carbon accumulation and cryoturbation processes in ORC-HL, metrics were not applied to soil carbon for establishing a model score.…”
Section: Evaluation Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial patterns of soil carbon density simulated by OLD and NEW (0-2 m depth) are shown in Fig. 11c, compared with those from HWSD (0-1 m depth; FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, 2012) and NCSCD (0-1 m depth; Hugelius et al, 2013). Over the grid cells present in NCSCD, the total soil carbon is 285 Pg in HWSD, markedly lower than that in NCSCD (460 Pg C for the upper meter of soil), indicating large uncertainties in the empirical soil carbon data.…”
Section: Soil Carbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The drawbacks underlying the PFT approach have been recently recognized (Kleidon & Mooney, ; Lavorel & Garnier, ; Kleidon et al ., ; Lavorel et al ., ; Prentice et al ., ; Reich et al ., ; Thuiller et al ., ; Ordoñez et al ., ; Williams et al ., ; Harrison et al ., ; Quillet et al ., ; McMahon et al ., ; van Bodegom et al ., , ; Stoy et al ., ; Wullschleger et al ., ; Anderegg, ). The importance of representing plant trait diversity within models has been also highlighted using statistical tools (Pappas et al ., , for a detailed sensitivity analysis of a DGVM), or by embedding trait variability in vegetation models (Wang et al ., ), or ESMs (Verheijen et al ., , but see Higgins et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most DGVMs, the traits for a given PFT are fixed, but Verheijen et al (2013) conducted a variable trait simulation with the JSBACH model for three leaf traits (Specific Leaf Area, and the constants defining the maximum rate of photosynthesis, v cmax , j max ) based on observed trait-climate relationships, emphasizing the need for climate-dependent and regional trait-variation modeling. Higgins et al (2014) pointed out the inherent limitations in Verheijen et al (2013) using a statistical method to parameterize plant trait diversity, and proposed that the focus should not be on trait values, but rather on the trade-offs between traits (Scheiter et al, 2013). In this study, we will use a fixed trait approach to describe the characteristics of each PFT in ORCHIDEE (the PFTs are listed in Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%