54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-1292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations

Abstract: This paper presents the application of an aerodynamic shape optimization methodology, Jetstream, to several cases in order to characterize the methodology and demonstrate its ability to solve challenging problems. In Jetstream, geometry parameterization and mesh movement are integrated by fitting the multi-block structured grids with B-spline volumes and applying mesh movement based on linear elasticity to the control points. Geometry control is achieved through either of two di↵erent approaches: using the B-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computational cost of evaluating the partial derivatives of an objective or constraint function is insensitive to the number of design variables, requiring only one flow solution and one adjoint solution. This method becomes the most practical one for the design of complex aerodynamic configurations [56,57] because it can deal with the optimization problems with 100-1000 design variables [58,59] or even more. The drawback of a gradient-based method is that the solution optimality can be sensitive to the initial guesses, and it can become trapped into a local minimum [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational cost of evaluating the partial derivatives of an objective or constraint function is insensitive to the number of design variables, requiring only one flow solution and one adjoint solution. This method becomes the most practical one for the design of complex aerodynamic configurations [56,57] because it can deal with the optimization problems with 100-1000 design variables [58,59] or even more. The drawback of a gradient-based method is that the solution optimality can be sensitive to the initial guesses, and it can become trapped into a local minimum [60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koo and Zingg [48] applied the algorithm to the CRM wing-body-tail configuration, in addition to several wingletted wings sized for the Boeing 737-900; these included a winglet up configuration, a wingtip fence configuration, and a split-tip configuration. Jetstream has also been used by Reist and Zingg [18] to design and study a lifting-fuselage configuration.…”
Section: Aerodynamic Shape Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyu, Z.J. and others [7][8][9][10][11] introduced longitudinal trim consideration into gradient-based optimization by deriving adjoint equations for solving zero-pitching moment constraints. Rubén [12] applied Prandtl's lifting line theory to compute the lift distribution of wings and horizontal tails, optimizing the combination using genetic algorithms to achieve optimal lift distribution while considering longitudinal trim.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%