Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: A review

Development and implementation of supply chain optimization framework for CO 2 capture and storage in the Netherlands

“…Few reasons, other than the underestimation of the storage injection and transportation costs, may be the compositions of CO 2 in various flue gas sources used might have been inaccurate which can affect the costs considerably (as shown in fig. 3) or the model used for the capture and compression cost itself may not be accurate enough. However, literature also supports the fact that the capture and compression costs are the major contributor to the 365 CCS costs [10,42,14]. The main takeaway is that the capture processes cause the major lump of expenses and further optimization or invention of new technologies at much lower costs for capture can cause a major change in the overall costs.…”

“…Capture Compression Transport Storage [13,10,14]. Post-combustion capture is a process that involves the capture of CO 2 from flue gas after combustion in any stationary source and the separation is mainly from flue gas and nitrogen.…”

Supercritical Adsorption Based CO<sub>2</sub> Capture from N<sub>2</sub>/CO<sub>2</sub> Mixture by Activated Carbon and Carbon Molecular Sieve

“…Although there is no single solution for CO 2 emission, every method has its advantages and limitations, and an appropriate technology for CO 2 capture is dependent on the type of the anthropogenic source and operating conditions, an alternative various technology for CO 2 capture is a must have topic [20,21]. Among a series of the art of state separation technologies including the absorption with liquids, purification by membrane, cryogenic distillation and adsorption using solids, which were developed over the past decades, and some new technologies like the enzyme based separation, calcium looping CO 2 capture and mixed matrix membrane, which were invented in the recent years [22], the adsorption with solids appears to be the most promising alternative strategy for CO 2 capture [23][24][25].…”

Análise Termodinâmica Da Captura E Reinjeção De Co2 No Processamento De Gás Natural Em Uma Instalação De Produção De Petróleo Offshore

“…Para esta dissertação, foram selecionados mais de 30 documentos sobre o assunto, a serem analisados. A mudança climática causada pela emissão de gases de efeito estufa -como o CO2 -foi a motivação para dezesseis artigos (Figueroa et al, 2008;Gibbins & Chalmers, 2008;Aydin et al, 2010;Brunetti et al, 2010;Hussain & Hägg, 2010;Merkel et al, 2010;Hongjun et al, 2011;Kurokawa et al, 2011;Pires et al, 2011;Mondal et al, 2012;Adewole et al, 2013;Iribarren et al, 2013;Saygin et al, 2013;Shao et al, 2013;Vaccarelli et al, 2014). E o consumo de energia também tem sido um Quanto às tecnologias usadas para a captura de CO2 no gás natural geológico ou antropogênico, as mais estudadas são: absorção, adsorção, separação criogênica e uso de membranas.…”

“…Alguns artigos citam a combinação de algumas delas. A tecnologia mais amplamente utilizada é a absorção, que foi tratada em doze artigos (Chakma, 1997;Davison & Thambimuthu, 2005;Figueroa et al, 2008;Gibbins & Chalmers, 2008;Hongjun et al, 2011;Pires et al, 2011;Amrollahi et al, 2012;Mondal et al, 2012;Yeo et al, 2012;Goto et al, 2013;Iribarren et al, 2013;Desideri & Antonelli, 2014). A adsorção, por sua vez foi citada em nove artigos (Davison & Thambimuthu, 2005;Figueroa et al, 2008;Hongjun et al, 2011;Pires et al, 2011;Mondal et al, 2012;Yeo et al, 2012;Gazzani et al, 2013;Goto et al, 2013;Iribarren et al, 2013) e a separação criogênica, em sete (Davison & Thambimuthu, 2005;Figueroa et al, 2008;Brunetti et al, 2010;Pires et al, 2011;Mondal et al, 2012;Goto et al, 2013;Iribarren et al, 2013).…”