2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress and challenges of fish sperm vitrification: A mini review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above, some scientists suggested using fish spermatozoa freezing model to investigate the mechanisms of why cryoprotectant-free vitrification for human ejaculates is better than conventional freezing and vitrification with cryoprotectants [15,16,50].…”
Section: Does Vitrification Have To Be Ultra-fast Freezing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted above, some scientists suggested using fish spermatozoa freezing model to investigate the mechanisms of why cryoprotectant-free vitrification for human ejaculates is better than conventional freezing and vitrification with cryoprotectants [15,16,50].…”
Section: Does Vitrification Have To Be Ultra-fast Freezing?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to human spermatozoa, fish spermatozoa have lower mitochondrial membrane cryostability. Therefore, fish spermatozoa can be used as a model to investigate cryostability in human spermatozoa damage [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its benefits, vitrification exposes spermatozoa to physiologically inappropriate conditions and, consequently, leads to cell damage due to osmotic and thermal shock, biochemical changes in seminal plasma and oxidative stress; therefore, it reduces sperm quality (Kopeika & Kopeika, 2008) and, consequently, sperm's capacity to fertilize. Some factors required for the vitrification process may be deleterious to cells: the first is the use of high cryoprotectant concentrations, which may have toxic effects on cells, and the second is the use of high cooling and heating rates, which can be difficult to achieve when using large volumes of solution (Rubinsky, 2003;Xin et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for standardized approaches is recognized in some publications, but not dealt with beyond research scale (e.g., Asturiano et al 2017). Many of these reviews also focus on direct comparisons of protocol details (e.g., extender and cryoprotectant) and results (e.g., motility, fertility, and cell viability) (e.g., Cabrita et al 2010; Xin et al 2017) despite the tremendous differences in practice, terminology, and reporting that disallow or weaken such comparisons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%