1989
DOI: 10.3133/ofr89137a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programs for the automatic processing and interpretation of Schlumberger sounding curves in QuickBASIC 4.0

Abstract: This open-file is composed of two parts: (a) The manual you are reading now (including examples and program listings which are given in the appendix), and (b) the disk with computer programs and test examples. Two computer programs are presented. The-first program (ATO.EXE) is based on a new method for the automatic interpretation of Schlumberger sounding curves obtained over horizontally stratified media (Zohdy, in press). The second program (PICKCONT.EXE) is a utility program that reads layering-files create… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
4

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These preliminary estimations were later used as a start model incorporating known geology and the available well data for a fast computer-assisted interpretation RESIST written by [18]. The results of interpretation were also compared with the result of purely automatic inversion programs without any assumptions of layering model in which the layering model is obtained directly from a digitized sounding curve [19]. In order to get a reasonable interpretation of geoelectrical measurements about the hydro-geological setting of the study area, a correlation between the available borehole log records in the vicinity of surveyed sites have been constructed (Figure 3) and used in deducing the Lithological-resistivity interpretation A Summary list of the interpreted geo-electrical models for VES soundings are presented in Table 2, while (Figures 4-6) show three examples of VES curves and their geophysical interpretation.…”
Section: Geoelectrical Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These preliminary estimations were later used as a start model incorporating known geology and the available well data for a fast computer-assisted interpretation RESIST written by [18]. The results of interpretation were also compared with the result of purely automatic inversion programs without any assumptions of layering model in which the layering model is obtained directly from a digitized sounding curve [19]. In order to get a reasonable interpretation of geoelectrical measurements about the hydro-geological setting of the study area, a correlation between the available borehole log records in the vicinity of surveyed sites have been constructed (Figure 3) and used in deducing the Lithological-resistivity interpretation A Summary list of the interpreted geo-electrical models for VES soundings are presented in Table 2, while (Figures 4-6) show three examples of VES curves and their geophysical interpretation.…”
Section: Geoelectrical Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field measurements were made with a minimum and maximum current electrode spacing (AB) of 400 and 1,000 m, respectively. The collected VES data were interpreted using both the multi-layer forward (Zohdy and Bisdorf 1989) and Inverse (Cooper 2001) methods. The intentions of the use of two models were to increase the acceptability of interpretation and hence furnish accurate information on groundwater-bearing formation underneath.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resistivity values as a function of depth are derived from the sounding curve with the aid of digitalcomputer programs (Zohdy, 1989;Zohdy and Bisdorf, 1989). Maximum electrode half-spacings for this survey ranged from 1,400 to 12,000 ft.…”
Section: Description Of Resistivity Survey and Location Of Profiles Amentioning
confidence: 99%