1972
DOI: 10.1145/361454.361485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programming languages

Abstract: This paper discusses both the history and future of programming languages (= higher level languages). Some of the difficulties in writing such a history are indicated. A key part of the paper is a tree showing the chronological development of languages and their interrelationships, Reasons for the proliferation of languages are given. The major languages are listed with the reasons for their importance. A section on chronology indicates the happenings of the significant previous time periods and the major topi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as 1960 there were 73 languages in existence (Sammet, 1972). By 1967 there were 117, and by 1971 there were 164 (Sammet, 1972).…”
Section: History Of Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As early as 1960 there were 73 languages in existence (Sammet, 1972). By 1967 there were 117, and by 1971 there were 164 (Sammet, 1972).…”
Section: History Of Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as 1960 there were 73 languages in existence (Sammet, 1972). By 1967 there were 117, and by 1971 there were 164 (Sammet, 1972). One response to the difficulty of determining language significance was taken by the ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN).…”
Section: History Of Language Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sources for this section include (Sammet, 1969;Booch, 1991;Grogono, 1999;Lambert & Osborne, 2000;Mitchell, 2003;Calgary, 2005;Davidgould, 2008;Network Dictionary, 2008).…”
Section: Classification Of Programming Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to programming paradigm, the purpose of use is an important characteristic of a language: it is unlikely to see one language fitting all needs for all purposes (Sammet, 1969). Programming languages can be divided, according to their purpose, into general-purpose languages, system programming languages, scripting languages, domain-specific languages, and concurrent / distributed languages (or a combination of these).…”
Section: Classification Of Programming Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, according to Sammet J. [2], [3] over 200 programming languages were developed between 1952 and 1972, but she considered only about 13 of them to be significant. Some of them appeared more than 50 years ago and continue in use today.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%