2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40751-021-00096-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programming in Mathematics Classrooms: Changes in Pre-service Teachers’ Intentions to Integrate Robots in Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative methods consisted of a s computational thinking test, a computer programming attitude scale, and an energy knowledge test Uzumcu and Bay ( 2021 ) Mixed-method research design Basic descriptive statistics and content analysis Design-based research The qualitative methods consisted of graduation projects. The quantitative methods(OXO) consisted of the computational thinking related skill tests Umutlu ( 2021 ) Qualitative research design Content analysis Case study The qualitative methods consisted of learning activities Alqahtani et al ( 2022 ) mixed-method research design a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and content analysis Design-based research The qualitative methods consisted of qualitative reflections. The quantitative methods consisted of a questionnaire Bouck et al ( 2021 ) Mixed-method research design Basic descriptive statistics and content analysis Exploratory Quantitative and qualitative methods consisted of preservice teachers’ lesson plans and reflections 7 .…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quantitative methods consisted of a s computational thinking test, a computer programming attitude scale, and an energy knowledge test Uzumcu and Bay ( 2021 ) Mixed-method research design Basic descriptive statistics and content analysis Design-based research The qualitative methods consisted of graduation projects. The quantitative methods(OXO) consisted of the computational thinking related skill tests Umutlu ( 2021 ) Qualitative research design Content analysis Case study The qualitative methods consisted of learning activities Alqahtani et al ( 2022 ) mixed-method research design a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and content analysis Design-based research The qualitative methods consisted of qualitative reflections. The quantitative methods consisted of a questionnaire Bouck et al ( 2021 ) Mixed-method research design Basic descriptive statistics and content analysis Exploratory Quantitative and qualitative methods consisted of preservice teachers’ lesson plans and reflections 7 .…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers’ willingness is also crucial to improve their CT ability. Only when teachers are willing to learn relevant CT knowledge can their understanding and application of CT be further improved (Alqahtani et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, research has shown that people’s attitude is composed of emotion, behavior, and cognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those authors report improvements in PST perceived knowledge of robotics and understanding of the integration of ER in mathematics teaching; they suggest that ER should be part of long-term training programs so that PST can experience its use in a contextualized way, as well as create and implement lesson plans that integrate ER in teaching curriculum content. A study by Alqahtani et al (2022) dedicated to the design and implementation of lesson plans that integrate ER reports improvements in PST perceptions regarding their willingness to integrate ER in their teaching practices and difficulty in manipulating the robots, arguing that the simplicity of the robot used contributed to the improvements in PST perceptions. The same authors suggest that PST should have opportunities to interact and explore the potential of ER during their training.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15.8/3 31.6/6 36.8/7 15.8/3 0.0/0 0.0/0 10.5/2 21.1/4 63.2/12 5.3/1 0.0/0 10.5/2 31.6/6 57.9/11 0.0/0 Q50 5.3/1 10.5/2 42.1/8 42.1/8 0.0/0 0.0/0 0.0/0 10.5/2 84.2/16 5.3/1 0.0/0 10.5/2 15.8/3 73.7/14 0.0/0 Q51 15.8/3 10.5/2 52.6/10 21.1/4 0.0/0 0.0/0 0.0/0 26.3/5 63.2/12 10.5/2 0.0/0 15.8/3 10.5/2 73.7/14 0.0/0 Q52 10.5/2 10.5/2 63.2/12 15.8/3 0.0/0 0.0/0 0.0/0 26.3/5 68.4/13 5.3/1 0.0/0 10.5/2 10.5/2 73.7/14 5.3/1 M (%) 11.8 15.8 48.7 23.7 0.0 0.0 2.6 21.1 69.8 6.6 0.0 11.8 17.1 69.8 1.3 Note. 1-I totally disagree; 2-I disagree; 3-I neither agree nor disagree; 4-I agree; 5-I totally agree; & M: mean contributing to an appropriate integration of ER into their future teaching practices (Alqahtani et al, 2022;Davis, 1989;Keren & Fridin, 2014;Schina et al, 2021b). In this section we discuss the influence of a training program that integrates ER and the use of learning scenarios in ITT for primary school on PST perceptions regarding: (e) SE in the integration of ER in their own teaching practice.…”
Section: Q49mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activity was part of a larger project (Alqahtani et al, 2022) which began with robot-integrated mathematical tasks in a mathematics methods course as preparation for the PSTs. The PSTs then worked in pairs to create robot-integrated activities based on their interactions in the course.…”
Section: Activity Learning Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%