1989
DOI: 10.1037/0090-5550.34.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programming for occupational outcomes following traumatic brain injury.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of impairments and disabilities common to this client group can make a significant impression on the chances of successful reintegration into work and need to be understood by the service providers. After studying the employment outcomes for brain injury survivors following a vocational rehabilitation programme, Haffey and Lewis (1989) suggested that the most significant problems related to cognitive and communicative functions, emotional and behavioural control, reduced cognitive and motor speed, and inappropriate social skills. This list is not unique to Haffey and Lewis' (1989) study but is commonly found in most brain injury literature (Brooks et al, 1987;Wood and Eames, 1989;Rosenthal et al, 1990;Giles and Clark-Wilson, 1993).…”
Section: Providers Of the Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The range of impairments and disabilities common to this client group can make a significant impression on the chances of successful reintegration into work and need to be understood by the service providers. After studying the employment outcomes for brain injury survivors following a vocational rehabilitation programme, Haffey and Lewis (1989) suggested that the most significant problems related to cognitive and communicative functions, emotional and behavioural control, reduced cognitive and motor speed, and inappropriate social skills. This list is not unique to Haffey and Lewis' (1989) study but is commonly found in most brain injury literature (Brooks et al, 1987;Wood and Eames, 1989;Rosenthal et al, 1990;Giles and Clark-Wilson, 1993).…”
Section: Providers Of the Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After studying the employment outcomes for brain injury survivors following a vocational rehabilitation programme, Haffey and Lewis (1989) suggested that the most significant problems related to cognitive and communicative functions, emotional and behavioural control, reduced cognitive and motor speed, and inappropriate social skills. This list is not unique to Haffey and Lewis' (1989) study but is commonly found in most brain injury literature (Brooks et al, 1987;Wood and Eames, 1989;Rosenthal et al, 1990;Giles and Clark-Wilson, 1993). It highlights the complexities attached to an acquired brain injury, and thereby supports the need for skilled guioance in areas of vocational rehabilitation.…”
Section: Providers Of the Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While vocational evaluation represents the 'traditional curriculum' of rehabilitation counselling, it has nevertheless been tailored to meet the needs of ABI clients whose cognitive deficits and potential psychosocial problems represent greater barriers to vocational recovery than do physical or other sequelae (McMahon et al,1988). There has, in particular, been greater interest in supported employment and the utilisation of compensatory and natural co-worker support strategies (Golden, Smith & Golden, 1993;Haffey & Lewis, 1989;Hurt, 1991;Wehman, Kreutzer, Sale, West, Morton & Diambra, 1989). This trend is a relatively recent phenomenon characterised by higher rates of employment among persons with mild to severe ABI who received intensive neuropsychological and vocational rehabilitation programs (see Crisp, 1992a).…”
Section: Vocational Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychosocial adaptation including performance in self-monitoring, impulse-control, and social discrimination exerts considerable influence on outcome (Haffey & Lewis, 1989; Prigatano, 1987a). Despite the importance of these variables, there has been little consensus regarding an appropriate instrument to assess neurobehavioral functioning (Brooks & McKinlay, 1983; Cripe, 1991).…”
Section: Assessment Of Neurobehavioral Functioning: Review Of the Kat...mentioning
confidence: 99%