Programming Educational Behavior for Institutionalized Adolescents

Cohen, Harold; Filipczak, James

doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-016327-7.50016-4

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Token economies have successfully flourished in both small-and large-scale settings (Atthowe, 1973b;Kazdin and Bootzin, 1972), in mental hospitals (Krasner and Atthowe, 1971;Ayllon and Azrin, 1968), in mental retardation training schools (Hamilton, 1971;Watson, 1967), in correctional institutions (Cohen and Filipczuk, 1971;McKee and Clements, 1971 ), in outpatient settings (Salvin and Daniels, 1971), in rehabilitation workshops (Zimmerman et al, 1969), in a summer camp for emotionally disturbed children (Rickard and Dinoff, 1971); in educational settings of all types and variety with both normal and disturbed children (Altman and Linton, 1971;O'Leary and Drabman, 1971 ), and in residential settings (Henderson, 1969;Phillips, 1968) and day-care centers (Spiegler, 1974). Token economies have successfully flourished in both small-and large-scale settings (Atthowe, 1973b;Kazdin and Bootzin, 1972), in mental hospitals (Krasner and Atthowe, 1971;Ayllon and Azrin, 1968), in mental retardation training schools (Hamilton, 1971;Watson, 1967), in correctional institutions (Cohen and Filipczuk, 1971;McKee and Clements, 1971 ), in outpatient settings (Salvin and Daniels, 1971), in rehabilitation workshops (Zimmerman et al, 1969), in a summer camp for emotionally disturbed children (Rickard and Dinoff, 1971); in educational settings of all types and variety with both normal and disturbed children (Altman and Linton, 1971;O'Leary and Drabman, 1971 ), and in residential settings (Henderson, 1969;Phillips, 1968) and day-care centers (Spiegler, 1974).…”

Section: Social Intervention Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavior Modification, Behavior Therapy, and Environmental Design

Atthowe

1975

American Behavioral Scientist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last ten to fifteen years a number of procedures for modifying and thus controlling human behavior have gained prominence. The newer drugs and medical therapies and the recent behavior therapy movement have made it possible to change behavior in a relatively efficient, more predictable, and more rapid manner. Consequently, the question of behavior and social control has suddenly emerged as a topic of social concern. At the same time and spurred on by the ominous specter of social control, federal and state legislative bodies, the legal professions, and the health and service professions themselves have rightly begun to question the ethics of the unrestricted use of techniques of social and behavioral control. In order to come to grips with the question, however, we must first define our domain of discourse and the state of the &dquo;art.&dquo; Many of the problems that have arisen and have appeared in the popular press and magazines have been pseudo issues, and the misuse of

show abstract