2018
DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-17-00094.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmatic Assessment in Emergency Medicine: Implementation of Best Practices

Abstract: The implementation of programmatic assessment allowed our program to organize diverse, multisourced feedback to drive both formative and summative assessments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approximately half of reviewed literature (52%, 15/29) focused on one of the four key themes, with the other half addressing multiple themes (48%, 14/29). Four papers discussed all four of our themes 12,46,52,53 . There was one additional theme that was found in our literature review that focused on the functioning of competency committees, suggesting that this is an emerging area of scholarly interest 33,37,43,51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Approximately half of reviewed literature (52%, 15/29) focused on one of the four key themes, with the other half addressing multiple themes (48%, 14/29). Four papers discussed all four of our themes 12,46,52,53 . There was one additional theme that was found in our literature review that focused on the functioning of competency committees, suggesting that this is an emerging area of scholarly interest 33,37,43,51 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…12,43,44 They encouraged the purposeful collection of WBA data using multiple methods, by multiple assessors, and across multiple contexts to mitigate the risks of biased sampling and to address limitations of individual assessment tools and individual rater shortcomings, such as halo or leniency effects. 18,43,46 Best practice models of programmatic assessment were described as a systematic way of organizing assessments; with regard to WBAs, this included the intentional collection of data from multiple sources over time. 46 Two papers provided detailed descriptions of the design and implementation of their program of assessment, 17,46 highlighting the benefits related to normalizing the collection of daily WBA and facilitating downstream data aggregation and interpretation.…”
Section: The Forms Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognizing the importance of performance input from a variety of sources,3 many of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones recommend multi-source feedback, which is further supported by a mandate from the Emergency Medicine (EM) Residency Review Committee. Nursing perspective is particularly relevant to several of the EM milestones 4.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universities that have recently implemented full programmatic assessment within health professional courses include the University of Groningen and Utrecht University, Netherlands, for medicine and veterinary medicine; McMaster University and the University of Toronto, Canada, for undergraduate and post‐graduate medicine; Université de Montréal, Canada, for veterinary medicine; and Flinders University, Australia, for graduate‐entry medicine. These and other more recent adopters are building on early research and adding to the knowledge about implementing programmatic assessment in different contexts 14 , 15 …”
Section: Current Status and Future Of Programmatic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%