2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2005
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2005.1545375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmable parts: a demonstration of the grammatical approach to self-organization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lipson et al have developed a stochastic fluidic assembly system consisting of cubic modules whose assembly is controlled by pressure and suction [19,17]. Klavins et al have developed a set of triangular tiles that circulate on an air table and magnetically bond with their neighbors [1]. The Kilobot system [16] consists of 1000 autonomous robots that use stick-slip locomotion to form planar shapes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lipson et al have developed a stochastic fluidic assembly system consisting of cubic modules whose assembly is controlled by pressure and suction [19,17]. Klavins et al have developed a set of triangular tiles that circulate on an air table and magnetically bond with their neighbors [1]. The Kilobot system [16] consists of 1000 autonomous robots that use stick-slip locomotion to form planar shapes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the algorithm is distributed and does not rely on a centralized, external controller, the distributed algorithm provides a scalable solution. No module ever stores the complete goal shape nor the global state of the system; the memory required by each module is O (1). Furthermore, the number of inter-module The distributed duplication algorithm is capable of duplicating arbitrary 3D objects like the coffee mug (left) using a collection of intelligent modules modules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we address the key challenge of going beyond such limitations and aim to design more complex structures via magnetic assembly. To increase the complexity of magnetic assemblies, Klavins et al [17] developed programmable units that move passively on an air-table and bind to each other upon random collisions. These programmable units have on-board processors that can change the magnetic properties of the units dynamically during assembly.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These programmable units have on-board processors that can change the magnetic properties of the units dynamically during assembly. Once attached, they execute local rules that determine how their internal states change and whether they should remain bound based on the theory of graph grammars [17]. This form of assembly is referred to as active assembly.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some robots use a mechanism to push modules away from each other until the attraction force has no more effect, for example with a Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) [12]. Others rotate the permanent magnets so that they repel each other [24]. Permanent magnets are useful at the cm scale though their attractive force decreases with third power with respect to the size.…”
Section: Connection Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%