2011
DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1070
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmable molecular recognition based on the geometry of DNA nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
377
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(3 reference statements)
8
377
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increasing number of nucleotides makes it difficult to scale up, due to the cost of the strands, the design challenges for controlling the spurious interactions among distinct strands, and the resulting decrease in yield. Using hierarchical approaches, DNA molecules can be annealed in two stages, first self-assembling into smaller structures such as cross-shaped DNA tiles 34 or DNA origami tiles, [11][12][13] and then the individual tiles coming together to form larger structures. In the two-stage approaches, the interior strands can be reused for different tiles, but an increasing number of unique edge strands is still required.…”
Section: Supplementary Information Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing number of nucleotides makes it difficult to scale up, due to the cost of the strands, the design challenges for controlling the spurious interactions among distinct strands, and the resulting decrease in yield. Using hierarchical approaches, DNA molecules can be annealed in two stages, first self-assembling into smaller structures such as cross-shaped DNA tiles 34 or DNA origami tiles, [11][12][13] and then the individual tiles coming together to form larger structures. In the two-stage approaches, the interior strands can be reused for different tiles, but an increasing number of unique edge strands is still required.…”
Section: Supplementary Information Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4) were designed with no staple crossovers at the end of each helix row, allowing relaxed edges in which blunt ends are free to adopt normal groove angles and stacking interactions between tiles are encouraged. 1 In contrast, if the edge staples are designed with staple crossovers, the scaffold and staple crossovers will pull the phosphates 180 • away from each other in the blunt ends and result in weakened stacking interactions.…”
Section: S23 Staple Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S4) in every three columns of staples. 1,7 a b Figure S4: Two designs of bridge staples for a square DNA origami tile. a, A "strong-weak" bridge design that uses longer domains on one side of the seams between adjacent triangles and shorter domains on the other.…”
Section: S23 Staple Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations