1994
DOI: 10.1179/000705994798267999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmable Linear Polarisation Meter for Determination of Corrosion Rate of Reinforcement in Concrete Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data provides a valuable insight into the instantaneous corrosion rate of the steel reinforcement, giving more detailed information than a simple potential survey (Song et al 2007). More details regarding Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) Measurement technique can be found in Gowers et al (1994) and Broomfield (1996).…”
Section: Surface Potential (Sp) Measurements (Ilzic 1995)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data provides a valuable insight into the instantaneous corrosion rate of the steel reinforcement, giving more detailed information than a simple potential survey (Song et al 2007). More details regarding Linear Polarization Resistance (LPR) Measurement technique can be found in Gowers et al (1994) and Broomfield (1996).…”
Section: Surface Potential (Sp) Measurements (Ilzic 1995)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinforcing bars interfere with resistivity measurements (Song et al 2007). (Stern and Geary 1957, Gowers et al 1994and Broomfield 1996 The electrochemical principle behind the linear polarization technique is based on the Stern-Geary equation, which gives the inverse relationship between the corrosion current density and the polarization resistance with the Stern-Geary constant and the area of steel that is polarized. The normal set up requires three electrodes.…”
Section: Surface Potential (Sp) Measurements (Ilzic 1995)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16) as outlined above. In the area of the sensor set 3, the MC currents turn into anodic currents during depolarization, the anodic currents (0.1 mA/ cm 2 ) are of a magnitude that is expected for passive steel [26]. The question (2), is the steel reinforcement really in a passive or at least non-corroding state, if there are no anodic MC currents detectable on the MC sensor set during depolarization, arises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 and 12). If there is no or negligible corrosion -passive steel may corrode up to a rate of 0.2 mA/cm 2 [26] -then the ohmic potential shift will also be negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrochemical methods for studying corrosion mechanism of steel in concrete are indispensable according to its electrochemical principle in nature. However, because of high resistivity, occluded system and complexity for the steel/concrete system, most of traditional electrochemical methods, such as half-cell potential measurement [5,6], polarization resistance [7][8][9], ac impedance [10,11], and even electrochemical noise measurement [12][13][14][15], are difficult to obtain information on local corrosion of steel rebar in concrete. It remains a challenge to in situ follow the mutual actions of micro corrosion cells and macro corrosion cells for a corrosion process at the steel/concrete interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%