2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.034306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Programmable discriminator of coherent states: Experimental realization

Abstract: The optical implementation of the recently proposed unambiguous identification of coherent states is presented. Our system works as a programmable discriminator between two, in general nonorthogonal weak coherent states. The principle of operation lies in the interference of three light beams -two program states and one unknown coherent state which can be equal to whichever of the two program states. The experiment is based on fiber optics. Its results confirm theoretical predictions and the experimental setup… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the viability of unambiguous state discrimination has been demonstrated in many experiments (see e.g. [62][63][64][65]), the experimental realization of gate discrimination strategies is a rather unexplored territory. A recent experiment demonstrating unambiguous discrimination of two non-orthogonal gates was reported in [66] in the single-query scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the viability of unambiguous state discrimination has been demonstrated in many experiments (see e.g. [62][63][64][65]), the experimental realization of gate discrimination strategies is a rather unexplored territory. A recent experiment demonstrating unambiguous discrimination of two non-orthogonal gates was reported in [66] in the single-query scenario.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our receiver cannot reach the regime where states are discriminated without errors. It would however be very interesting (from an experimentalists point of view), to see whether a realistic experimental realisation of our strategy may outperform a practical "error-free" receiver as implemented in ref [22] (or the ideal proposed in Ref. [19]), since the measurements of such a device will also not result in error free data [22].…”
Section: Comparison Of Measurement Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar receiver for a set of unknown coherent states was proposed in [20]. The receiver is based on quantum comparison of coherent states [21] and was recently demonstrated for two unknown coherent states [22]. The optimality of the receiver for unknown states is shown in [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One further comparison that we can make is with a "classical amplifier" using unambiguous state discrimina tion (USD) [32][33][34] to determine the phase of the coherent states without error. This approach offers the potential of arbitrarily large amplification by creating coherent states with the same phase as the input states, but with any desired magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%