Proceedings 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2002
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2002.1016620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Program composition in Isabelle/UNITY

Abstract: We

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rules relative to Unity-like logics have been defined in [10,12]. They have also been mechanized with the higher-order theorem prover Isabelle, and hand-written proofs from [11,12,14] have been redone using the prover [33,19]. We now need to further investigate the use of transformers other than W E, as well as to explore application to other specification languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rules relative to Unity-like logics have been defined in [10,12]. They have also been mechanized with the higher-order theorem prover Isabelle, and hand-written proofs from [11,12,14] have been redone using the prover [33,19]. We now need to further investigate the use of transformers other than W E, as well as to explore application to other specification languages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkable formalizations for compositional approaches are [2,9] for the UNITY framework in Isabelle/HOL and the soundness proof of McMillan assume-guarantee rule [6] in PVS [12]. Surprisingly, there is not much work on embedding Hoare logics for parallelism in theorem provers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%