2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12065-020-00528-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognosticate of the financial market utilizing ensemble-based conglomerate model with technical indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a benchmark, we took the mean absolute error (MAE) of both the models. The model which gave less MAE value was the best predictive model [40]. As shown in Table 28, our proposed model showed a lower MAE value than the WLSTM+Attention model.…”
Section: Forecast Accuracy Comparison With Past Workmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a benchmark, we took the mean absolute error (MAE) of both the models. The model which gave less MAE value was the best predictive model [40]. As shown in Table 28, our proposed model showed a lower MAE value than the WLSTM+Attention model.…”
Section: Forecast Accuracy Comparison With Past Workmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The specialised investigators attempt to foresee the securities exchange through the learning of graphs that depict the historical market costs and technical indicators [37][38][39]. Technical indicators are statistical techniques that are calculated with the help of mathematical formulas using historical prices [40]. The development of artificial intelligence techniques and the increased number of datasets that are easily publicly available brings about new opportunities for researchers to explore something new from the market.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 2021 ) 0.47 0.52 23.36 0.19 74.12 0.49 0.53 13.86 0.18 45.12 0.8 0.82 2.82 0.18 8.28 RANSACRegressor (Aziz et al. 2020 ) 0.46 0.51 23.51 0.08 71.43 0.41 0.47 14.8 0.08 40.97 0.75 0.78 3.11 0.07 6.85 Ridge (McDonald 2009 ) 0.52 0.56 22.25 0.01 73.68 0.51 0.55 13.59 0.02 44.81 0.77 0.79 3.02 0.01 8.26 RidgeCV (Padhi and Padhy 2021 ) 0.54 0.58 21.73 0.01 73.64 0.55 0.59 12.92 0.01 44.81 0.78 0.8 2.94 0.01 8.26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%