2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2941796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostically Relevant Subtypes and Survival Prediction for Breast Cancer Based on Multimodal Genomics Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, we intend to extend this work by (i) alleviating more samples by combining genomics data from different sources and training a multimodal architecture, (ii) comparing studies on clustering based on feature extracted by DNN vs. PCA and (iii) improving the explanations about the predictions using both ante-hoc and post-hoc approaches. In particular, we plan to employ multimodality [ 55 ], since multiple factors are involved in disease diagnosis (e.g. estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth receptors in breast cancer), AI-based diagnoses might not be trustworthy solely based on a single modality, which demands the requirements of multimodal features (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we intend to extend this work by (i) alleviating more samples by combining genomics data from different sources and training a multimodal architecture, (ii) comparing studies on clustering based on feature extracted by DNN vs. PCA and (iii) improving the explanations about the predictions using both ante-hoc and post-hoc approaches. In particular, we plan to employ multimodality [ 55 ], since multiple factors are involved in disease diagnosis (e.g. estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth receptors in breast cancer), AI-based diagnoses might not be trustworthy solely based on a single modality, which demands the requirements of multimodal features (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the review of studies using incidence prediction for related risk factors, Artificial Intelligence (AI), or algorithms related to machine learning were used. The method of cancer gene mapping analysis was described in [16], where multimodal autoencoder (MAE) classifiers constructed using various risk factor data in breast cancer diagnosis were used to predict the survival rates of breast cancer prognosis. Abdikenov et al [17] proposed a Pareto optimality-based prognostic model to understanding changes in hyper-parameters in various performance metrics, and [18] presented a wrapper method that embeds Bayesian classifiers for hybrid feature selection of breast cancer datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since GVs data are high-dimensional, learning the association between each feature was fairly considered. Inspired by literature [20], [21], [52] and to qualitatively study whether the learned representation can express the biological characteristics of the individuals, t-SNE of the CAE encoder's output, i.e., latent FM and raw GVs are plotted in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Qualitative Study Of the Learned Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, approaches based on neural networks (DNNs) can be more effective at RL and feature extraction [18]. In particular, DNN architectures (e.g., autoencoder (AE)) with multiple hidden layers and non-linear activation functions, can capture more complex and higher-level features and contextual information from the input [19], [20], [21], [22]. Further, non-linear mappings allows transforming input data into more clusteringfriendly representations in which the data is mapped into a lower-dimensional feature space that helps fine-tune clustering [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%