2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Value of Tumor Size in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7,15,16 As shown in Figure 3, PFS and OS of UTUC without RPI were not significantly different from those of BC, suggesting poor prognosis of this condition. Although primary tumor size has been reported to be a prognostic factor in localized UTUC, 17 our data suggest that it is a prognostic factor in advanced UTUC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…7,15,16 As shown in Figure 3, PFS and OS of UTUC without RPI were not significantly different from those of BC, suggesting poor prognosis of this condition. Although primary tumor size has been reported to be a prognostic factor in localized UTUC, 17 our data suggest that it is a prognostic factor in advanced UTUC.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, extensive tumor necrosis (>10% of tumor area) has been reported to be associated with metastasis-and cancer-related deaths. Lastly, patients with larger tumor sizes are more likely to involve both the ureter and the renal pelvis, making open RNU necessary, and putting the patient at risk of poorer surgical outcomes [87][88][89].…”
Section: Tumor Presentation Location Multifocality and Sizementioning
confidence: 99%