2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09641-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 22 , 23 ] As an alternative parameter, TLR may show lower interscan variability because of the reference normalization (usually using normal liver uptake), which results in better reproducibility than SUVmax. [ 24 , 25 ] In this regard, our study results imply that TLR could be widely applied. However, future comparison studies between TLR and SUVmax should be conducted with more patients because both TLR and SUVmax (the second largest AUC) showed significant results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[ 22 , 23 ] As an alternative parameter, TLR may show lower interscan variability because of the reference normalization (usually using normal liver uptake), which results in better reproducibility than SUVmax. [ 24 , 25 ] In this regard, our study results imply that TLR could be widely applied. However, future comparison studies between TLR and SUVmax should be conducted with more patients because both TLR and SUVmax (the second largest AUC) showed significant results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%