2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: Validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract: Introduction The Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) quantifies residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Its predictive value has not been validated on large cohorts with long-term follow up. The objective of this work is to independently evaluate the prognostic value of the RCB index depending on BC subtypes (Luminal, HER2-positive and triple negative (TNBCs)). Methods We retrospectively evaluated the RCB index on surgical specimens from a cohort of T1-T3NxM0 BC patients treated with NAC between 2002 a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RCB index, first published in 2007, combines pathological findings from both the primary tumor bed and the regional lymph nodes. It has been validated as a predictor of the risk of recurrence in several independent cohorts [8,39] and is now widely used as a primary endpoint in clinical trials [52]. Several studies have suggested that the inclusion of additional factors, such as immunological features [53,54], lymphovascular invasion [55] or post-NAC Ki67 expression [56], could improve its performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RCB index, first published in 2007, combines pathological findings from both the primary tumor bed and the regional lymph nodes. It has been validated as a predictor of the risk of recurrence in several independent cohorts [8,39] and is now widely used as a primary endpoint in clinical trials [52]. Several studies have suggested that the inclusion of additional factors, such as immunological features [53,54], lymphovascular invasion [55] or post-NAC Ki67 expression [56], could improve its performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathological complete response (pCR) after NAC occurs in approximately 30% to 50% of cases and is associated with longer disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) [5,6]. For patients not achieving a pCR, the amount of residual disease (RD) can be assessed by determining the residual cancer burden (RCB) index, which can be used to classify patients into several prognostic groups [7,8]. The identification of patients with a poorer prognosis has important implications, as these patients may benefit from secondline treatments, such as adjuvant capecitabine [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed a previously described retrospective cohort of patients [ 42 , 43 ] with invasive breast carcinoma stage T1-T3NxM0 and treated with NAC at Institut Curie, Paris, between 2002 and 2012 (NEOREP Cohort, CNIL declaration number). We included unilateral, non-recurrent, non-inflammatory, non-metastatic tumors, excluding T4 tumors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyzed a previously described retrospective cohort of patients (18) (19) with invasive breast carcinoma stage T1-T3NxM0 and treated with NAC at Institut Curie, Paris, between 2002 and 2012 (NEOREP Cohort, CNIL declaration number 1547270). We included unilateral, non-recurrent, non-inflammatory, non-metastatic tumors, excluding T4 tumors.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%