2020
DOI: 10.1177/0003319720941723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Value of Elevated Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure on Short Term in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We appreciate the comments of Pamukcu and Acikel 1 about our paper entitled “Effect of Elevated Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure on Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.” 2 We would like to state that this was a retrospective study, which mainly reflected the independent effect of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) on short-term death, without further subgroup analysis, such as the analysis of association between PASP and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) site, revascularization time, or diuretics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We appreciate the comments of Pamukcu and Acikel 1 about our paper entitled “Effect of Elevated Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure on Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.” 2 We would like to state that this was a retrospective study, which mainly reflected the independent effect of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) on short-term death, without further subgroup analysis, such as the analysis of association between PASP and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) site, revascularization time, or diuretics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Pamukcu and Acikel 1 in their letter to the Editor comment on the “lower PCI rate in the high PASP group.” We agree that the mortality is expected to be lower after successful revascularization. 6 There were 69.5% of patients with Killip classification Ⅱ to Ⅳ in the high PASP group, and it was very difficult to implement percutaneous coronary intervention successfully in these critically ill patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%