2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of combined serum biomarkers in predicting outcomes in cervical cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the main goal of this study was to ascertain the rational for using IDO inhibitors in cervical cancer treatment; in contrast, the use of IDO activity as a prognostic marker should be analysed in comparison with serum markers already in use, such as prognostic serum biomarkers in SCC. 31 Our results are in accordance with earlier studies that have shown decreased tryptophan levels, increased kynurenine levels and a high Kyn/Trp ration in the serum of patients with various cancer types. [16][17][18][19]32 In addition, we have previously described the same for endometrial, ovarian and vulvar cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the main goal of this study was to ascertain the rational for using IDO inhibitors in cervical cancer treatment; in contrast, the use of IDO activity as a prognostic marker should be analysed in comparison with serum markers already in use, such as prognostic serum biomarkers in SCC. 31 Our results are in accordance with earlier studies that have shown decreased tryptophan levels, increased kynurenine levels and a high Kyn/Trp ration in the serum of patients with various cancer types. [16][17][18][19]32 In addition, we have previously described the same for endometrial, ovarian and vulvar cancer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Clinical laboratory echnicians found that combined tumor markers has relatively higher sensitivity in daily work. Researchers found that combined detection had great value in the diagnosis, analysis of effect, recurrence detection and prognosis of cancer (Duffy et al, 2013;Li et al, 2013;Sisik et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013;Yu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The presently used cytomorphological assessment is the most reliable screening method, although it results in high numbers of false-positive and false-negative cervical smears, especially for detection of early stage cancer. 3 Sensitivity and specificity is increased when implementing screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection reaching 91 and 88%, respectively, for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN, precancer stage) grade 2 or worse from healthy.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%