2022
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Value of Cardiac Axis Deviation in Systemic Sclerosis–Related Pulmonary Hypertension

Abstract: Objective Systemic sclerosis–related pulmonary hypertension (SSc‐PH) is a common complication of SSc associated with accelerated mortality. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether cardiac axis deviation indicates abnormalities in cardiac function allowing for prognostication of disease severity and mortality. Methods This was a retrospective study in which electrocardiograms (ECGs) were reviewed for cardiac axis deviation and their association with echocardiography and cardiopulmonary hemodynam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when the FVC/D L CO ratio was used in the random forest model instead of individual measurements of FVC and D L CO, the model performed poorly, likely related to the decrease in degrees of freedom of the model by collapsing 2 variables into 1 variable. Although ECG has been observed to be a prognostic indicator of all‐cause mortality in patients with SSc‐PH (13), it was not an important predictor of PH in the present study. The finding of an insignificant tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity in close to one‐quarter of patients is notable and consistent with previous findings (6).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, when the FVC/D L CO ratio was used in the random forest model instead of individual measurements of FVC and D L CO, the model performed poorly, likely related to the decrease in degrees of freedom of the model by collapsing 2 variables into 1 variable. Although ECG has been observed to be a prognostic indicator of all‐cause mortality in patients with SSc‐PH (13), it was not an important predictor of PH in the present study. The finding of an insignificant tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity in close to one‐quarter of patients is notable and consistent with previous findings (6).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…We incorporated the following as variables in the prediction models: 1) PFT variables including forced vital capacity (FVC) and D L CO (as individual variables and separately as FVC/D L CO ratio); 2) ECG variables including left axis deviation (LAD), right axis deviation (RAD), and right bundle branch block (RBBB) (13); 3) echocardiography variables including aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, pulmonic regurgitation, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial (LA) dilation, right atrial (RA) dilation, right ventricular (RV) dilation, RV dysfunction, and pericardial effusion; and 4) pulmonary artery (PA) diameter on CT chest imaging, measured at the level of the bifurcation of the main PA in the axial plane (14).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If any conflicts emerged during the review process, they were resolved by discussion among the readers. Sixty articles were finally included in this systematic literature review [ 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, activation of the basal anterolateral region may be delayed (Abu‐Alrub et al., 2021). Second, left axis deviation was related to left‐sided structural abnormalities, specifically LV diastolic and systolic dysfunction, as well as LV dilation (Lui et al., 2021). These two reasons may cause a decrease in the flow velocity in the left ventricle and cerebral blood flow, thereby contributing to stasis and ischemia of small‐vessel territories and brain infarcts (Cannistraro et al., 2019; Di Tullio et al., 1999; Nakanishi et al., 2017; Wardlaw et al., 2013; Yaghi et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%