2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic value of a three-grade classification in primary epithelial parotid carcinoma: Result of a histological review from a 20-year experience of total parotidectomy with neck dissection in a single institution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Squamoid variants of MECs were thoroughly sorted out (Schwarz et al , 2011). Grading was based on a three-tiered grading system (Therkildsen et al , 1998; Jouzdani et al , 2010). The ACCC, BCAC, EMC, CAC and PLGA were considered low grade (G1) with the exception of dedifferentiated tumours, which were classified high grade (G3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squamoid variants of MECs were thoroughly sorted out (Schwarz et al , 2011). Grading was based on a three-tiered grading system (Therkildsen et al , 1998; Jouzdani et al , 2010). The ACCC, BCAC, EMC, CAC and PLGA were considered low grade (G1) with the exception of dedifferentiated tumours, which were classified high grade (G3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All tumors were classified according the contemporary World Health Organization's classification of salivary gland tumors [1]. Grading was based on a 3-tiered grading system as recently described (Table 1) [17,18]. The 33 cases of carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma were classified and graded according to the malignant component of the tumor.…”
Section: Histology and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of clinical and pathological prognostic characteristics have been identified in PGCs, including histological grade, T stage, N stage, and facial nerve infiltration. Other features such as age, lymphovascular invasion at the primary tumor site, and surgical margin status are less–well‐established prognostic factors as a consequence of inconsistent findings across different studies, likely due to the intrinsic heterogeneity and the relatively low incidence of PGCs …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%