2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Value of a Long Non-coding RNA Signature in Localized Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
103
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely associated with tumor development and influence the prognosis of patients with tumors (19)(20)(21). The previous studies have indicated the predictive ability of lncRNA signatures for the prognosis of ESCC including our previous study (22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely associated with tumor development and influence the prognosis of patients with tumors (19)(20)(21). The previous studies have indicated the predictive ability of lncRNA signatures for the prognosis of ESCC including our previous study (22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The use of median or tertiles as a cutoff point to divide data into two or three groups is very common for testing model performance in clinical studies. [1][2][3] Second, with few training data, the parameter estimates will have greater variance, whereas with few testing data, our performance statistic will have greater variance. Therefore, there are no clear advantages of using the suggested 70:30 ratio over our approach (50:50).…”
Section: Genetic Risk Classifier To Predict Localised Renal Cell Carcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there are no clear advantages of using the suggested 70:30 ratio over our approach (50:50). Considering the performance of our model, an even 50:50 ratio for training versus testing sets is preferred, and this ratio is also very common in clinical studies [1][2][3][4] to divide data in a way that neither variance is too high. Some previous research has shown that the optimal splitting proportion is dependent on model complexities, which are associated with the probability of error on the training and testing sets.…”
Section: Genetic Risk Classifier To Predict Localised Renal Cell Carcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite researchers are exploring extensively the potential indicator or biomarker for predicting early relapse in RCC patients [10][11][12] , none of gene-based prognostic classifiers for predicting early relapse of RCC have been established. Although studies in clear cell RCC demonstrated that gene signature has better ability to both reflect heterogeneity of cancer and then accurately predict cancer prognosis [13][14][15] . These studies were limited to overall survival (OS)-related genes in clear cell RCC, and few precious gene profiling has been applied to detect the early relapse-associated multigene signature in both clear cell and papillary RCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%