2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic utility of pre- and post-treatment FDG-PET parameters in anal squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting that the majority of published studies have focused on the metabolic volume of the primary tumour (P-MTV) and found this to be prognostic for EFS [30,33,34], and in one study for OS [28]. In our study, whilst both T-MTV and P-MTV were prognostic, T-MTV was more relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting that the majority of published studies have focused on the metabolic volume of the primary tumour (P-MTV) and found this to be prognostic for EFS [30,33,34], and in one study for OS [28]. In our study, whilst both T-MTV and P-MTV were prognostic, T-MTV was more relevant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
“…An important finding of our study is that FDG-PET visual analysis of bilateral pelvic lymph node involvement resulted in a pejorative independent prognostic factor (p = 0.018), whereas in previous studies this was only the case for the presence or not of inguinal lymph node involvement [34]. The improved precision in our study is due to the classification of six distinct anatomical areas that include all of the potential lymph node lesions, allowing precise localized analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, it has been documented that T and N stages are prognostic factors related to survival [ 25 ]. Also, metabolic parameters derived from pre-therapy 2-[ 18 F]FDG PET/CT have been successfully employed for prognostication [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. However, the intensity of the 2-[ 18 F]FDG uptake on the pre-treatment scan has shown controversial results in inversely corresponding to survival [ 26 , 29 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%