2012
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.112.129437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Utility of Novel Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Stress

Abstract: Background Biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular events in community-based populations have not consistently added information to standard risk factors. A limitation of many previously studied biomarkers is their lack of cardiovascular specificity. Methods and Results To determine the prognostic value of 3 novel biomarkers induced by cardiovascular stress, we measured soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I in 3,428 participants (mean age 59, 53% women) in the Framin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

28
376
4
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
28
376
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of sST2 to demographics and clinical risk factors only modestly improved discrimination and risk reclassification for incident HF and cardiovascular death. However, similar to other cohorts, increasing levels of ST2 in older adults in a cross‐sectional analysis were associated with higher risk demographics, increased comorbidities, and increasing levels of cardiac specific and noncardiac specific biomarkers that have been independently associated with poorer outcomes 18, 27, 28, 39…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The addition of sST2 to demographics and clinical risk factors only modestly improved discrimination and risk reclassification for incident HF and cardiovascular death. However, similar to other cohorts, increasing levels of ST2 in older adults in a cross‐sectional analysis were associated with higher risk demographics, increased comorbidities, and increasing levels of cardiac specific and noncardiac specific biomarkers that have been independently associated with poorer outcomes 18, 27, 28, 39…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The association between sST2 and incident cardiovascular events has been examined in three general population cohorts previously: the Dallas Heart Study (DHS), FHS, and the FINRISK97 study 17, 18, 40. Compared to the CHS, the DHS cohort was significantly younger with a mean age of 43 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas GDF15, NT‐proBNP, ADM, cystatin‐C, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), and CRP are known to predict incident CVD and other outcomes,13, 14, 15, 16 there are a number of novel associations in our study to highlight. Specifically, a number of regulators of metabolic and adipocyte homeostasis appeared to predict adverse events in our study: IGF1 is involved in adipocyte proliferation and differentiation, and whereas some studies support a protective role with respect to atherosclerosis, others have not shown any association with coronary artery disease 17, 18.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Additionally, Galectin‐3 has been found to be associated with increased risk for all‐cause mortality in the Framingham Offspring Cohort 23. ST2 has been shown to be a sensitive biomarker of cardiac stress with statistically significant differences in concentration when stratified by age or sex 24, 25. We hypothesized that the use of these 3 biomarkers will improve the current risk prediction model used by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association CABG guidelines 26, 27, 28…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%