2000
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.5802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Its Receptors in Endometrial Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…VEGF status was also an independent predictor of 5-and 10-year survival. In other studies, however, VEGF expression did not correlate with the incidence of metastases, recurrence, and survival [27][28][29]. The reason for the discrepancies between studies may lie in the varying expression pattern of VEGF in early versus late stage endometrial cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…VEGF status was also an independent predictor of 5-and 10-year survival. In other studies, however, VEGF expression did not correlate with the incidence of metastases, recurrence, and survival [27][28][29]. The reason for the discrepancies between studies may lie in the varying expression pattern of VEGF in early versus late stage endometrial cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, these markers may not be specific of neoangiogenesis and may not stain all tumour blood vessels to the same degree, and results in terms of prognostic significance are controversial (Gasparini, 1996a, b;Vermeulen et al, 1996;Charpin et al, 1997). More recently, markers of activated endothelial cells, such as CD105 (Seon et al, 1997;Kumar et al, 1999;Fonsatti et al, 2001), Tie-2/Tek (Brown et al, 1995;Mustonen and Alitalo, 1995;Takahashi et al, 1995;Yokoyama et al, 2000) and VEGF (Salven et al, 1996;Peters et al, 1998) receptors as prognostic indicators more suitable for identifying stromal vessels resulting from tumour neoangiogenesis, have been reported. However, in breast carcinomas, the prognostic significance of these markers has not been evaluated in a large series and long-term follow-up.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples surgically obtained for immunohistochemistry were immediately fixed in formaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. Sections 6 µm thick were routinely passed through xylene and a graded alcohol series and stained for CR by the labelled streptavidin biotin method (LSAB kit; DAKO, Santa Barbara, CA) using anti-CR antibody as reported previously (Yokoyama et al, 2000). Anti-CR antibody was applied for 12 h at 4˚C in a moist chamber.…”
Section: Carbonyl Reductase As a Significant Predictor Of Survival Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 observers independently evaluated and interpreted the results of immunohistochemical staining, without knowledge of the clinical data of each patient. Immunohistochemical staining was evaluated according to a scoring method reported previously (Yokoyama et al, 2000). Namely, a score was established corresponding to the sum of: (1) the percentage of positive cells (0, 0% immunopositive cells; 1, < 25% positive cells; 2, 26-50% positive cells; and 3, > 50% positive cells); and (2) the staining intensity (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, high).…”
Section: Carbonyl Reductase As a Significant Predictor Of Survival Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation