1993
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.70.4.337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of transient ST segment changes after coronary artery bypass surgery: a long-term (4-10 year) follow up study.

Abstract: on between 1987 and 1988 and between 1982 and 1984.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[67][68][69][70][71] Also, although one small study found the presence of ambulatory ischemia after coronary artery bypass graft surgery to be associated with a significant excess of adverse clinical events, 72 this finding was disproved by further larger studies. 73,74 The problem of small size, which plagued earlier investigations, was resolved with the publication during the 1990s of a number of studies [75][76][77][78][79][80] of sufficient magnitude and statistical power (300 to 1000 patients followed up over 1 to 3 years) to answer with confidence the question of the importance of silent ischemia on ambulatory monitoring. The largest of these studies was the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia (MSMI) study 75 (nϭ943), which demonstrated no significant increase in primary cardiac events associated with ambulatory ischemia in stable patients Ͼ1 month (1 to 6 months) after MI or unstable angina.…”
Section: Patients With Anginamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[67][68][69][70][71] Also, although one small study found the presence of ambulatory ischemia after coronary artery bypass graft surgery to be associated with a significant excess of adverse clinical events, 72 this finding was disproved by further larger studies. 73,74 The problem of small size, which plagued earlier investigations, was resolved with the publication during the 1990s of a number of studies [75][76][77][78][79][80] of sufficient magnitude and statistical power (300 to 1000 patients followed up over 1 to 3 years) to answer with confidence the question of the importance of silent ischemia on ambulatory monitoring. The largest of these studies was the Multicenter Study of Myocardial Ischemia (MSMI) study 75 (nϭ943), which demonstrated no significant increase in primary cardiac events associated with ambulatory ischemia in stable patients Ͼ1 month (1 to 6 months) after MI or unstable angina.…”
Section: Patients With Anginamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that mortality of UA is highest at the time of hospital admission and decreases over the next two months. Patel et al (46) studied 212 patients with UA, average age 59 years, recruited within 24 h of an anginal episode. Death, myocardial infarction and/or revascularisation were assessed for 2.6 years.…”
Section: Definition Of High and Low Risk Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, ischemia detected on ambulatory ECG monitoring may predict adverse outcomes during short-term follow-up but not necessarily during long-term follow-up. [7][8][9] Furthermore, since the activity of coronary artery disease may fluctuate over time, ambulatory ischemia may be absent soon after infarction, as the lesion involved heals, but may develop later in some patients, if new unstable lesions develop. Consequently, the absence of ischemia early after infarction may not be highly predictive of the long-term outcome.…”
Section: Prognostic Implications Of Silent Myocardial Ischemiamentioning
confidence: 99%