2014
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of the intratumoral heterogeneity of 18F‐FDG uptake in oral cavity cancer

Abstract: The intratumoral heterogeneity of (18) F-FDG uptake may be a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in addition to cervical lymph node metastasis in oral cavity cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 110:702-706. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing interest in evaluating intra-tumoral heterogeneity by using FDG-PET with different parameters, such as textural analysis 31 , coefficient of variance (COV) 32 , cumulative SUV-volume histograms (CSH) 33 , the area under the CSH (AUC–CSH) 25 , fractal analysis 34,35 or heterogeneity factors 17 . To date, several studies have investigated the association between metabolic intra-tumoral heterogeneity of FDG uptake and patient's outcomes in several malignant tumours 36-38 including head and neck cancers 17,39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a growing interest in evaluating intra-tumoral heterogeneity by using FDG-PET with different parameters, such as textural analysis 31 , coefficient of variance (COV) 32 , cumulative SUV-volume histograms (CSH) 33 , the area under the CSH (AUC–CSH) 25 , fractal analysis 34,35 or heterogeneity factors 17 . To date, several studies have investigated the association between metabolic intra-tumoral heterogeneity of FDG uptake and patient's outcomes in several malignant tumours 36-38 including head and neck cancers 17,39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators found that HF was an independent predictor of overall survival (p = 0.002); patients with HI < −0.13 showed a worse prognosis than those with HF ≥ −0.13 (p = 0.005) 39 . Similarly, Yang et al explored the utility of pre-treatment FDG-PET tumor heterogeneity in 40 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, concluding that lower tumor heterogeneity indexes (HI), calculated by dividing SUV max by SUV mean , significantly predicted progression-free-survival and overall survival 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a limited degree, more complex analytics that explore the association of imaging features with oncologic outcomes have also been investigated, as these may be less dependent on the dose and timing of radiotracer administration (El Naqa et al 2009, Kwon et al 2014, Apostolova et al 2014). Although it appears that these individual imaging metrics are predictive to some degree for patient outcomes, they may not have sufficient predictive power to be clinically useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the computing method of linear regression slope of MTV varied among different researchers, and it needs more data to process [18,35,36]. The textural analysis and deep learning are more complex, which demand special workstation and professionals, and they are not feasible integrated into clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that the intratumoral heterogeneity derived from PET/CT can serve as a prognostic biomarker for treatment outcome in pancreatic cancer [18], uterine leiomyosarcoma [20], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [23], esophageal cancer [33], oral cavity cancer [35], and epithelial ovarian cancer [36]. Our results showed that the HI of the maximal neck lymph node was significantly associated with the long-term PFS in patients with primary NPC (HR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.22-8.54; p=0.018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%