2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Controlling Nutritional Status(CONUT) score, which is calculated from serum level of albumin, lymphocyte and cholesterol, actually re ects state of systemic in ammation, nutrition and immune responsiveness [14]. The prognostic value of CONUT has been con rmed in various clinical settings including cardiovascular disease, liver disease and cancer [15][16][17][18][19]. We designed this study to explore the correlation between CONUT and mortality of COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Controlling Nutritional Status(CONUT) score, which is calculated from serum level of albumin, lymphocyte and cholesterol, actually re ects state of systemic in ammation, nutrition and immune responsiveness [14]. The prognostic value of CONUT has been con rmed in various clinical settings including cardiovascular disease, liver disease and cancer [15][16][17][18][19]. We designed this study to explore the correlation between CONUT and mortality of COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent evidence reveals that many patients and tumor-related factors affect the prognosis of UTUC after RNU. Suzuki et al (32) and Xu et al (33) revealed that higher controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, greater age, lower BMI, higher CRP, higher pT stage, higher tumor grade, higher tumor size, concomitant variant histology (CVH), no curative treatment and no usage of pembrolizumab after the diagnosis of UTUC are independent and significant adverse prognostic factors. Besides, Xu et al (33) demonstrated that CONUT score was an independent predictor for CSS, RFS and OS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excluded from 7 reviews, 7 letters, and comments, 3 studies were unable to extract data entirely, and 2 studies with low literature quality scores. 7 retrospective studies and 1 propensity matching scoring study with 2232 patients were included in this meta-analysis at last (Figure 1) (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 studies reported the HR of the low CONUT group and the high CONUT group on OS, and a total of 2232 patients were enrolled (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). After the heterogeneity test, the heterogeneity among the studies was within the acceptable range (I 2 = 45.6%, P=0.075), and the fixed-effects model was used to pool HR.…”
Section: Survival Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%