2016
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Pre-treatment Serum C-Reactive Protein Level in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix

Abstract: Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer in women worldwide, with peak incidence in the 40-to 45-year age group (1). Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix is a rare histological subtype, representing up to 20% of cervical carcinoma. International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histological grade, tumour size, lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node metastasis are major prognostic factors reported in literature (1-3). Nevertheless, additional information guiding the patient's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barbara analysed prognostic value of serum CRP in rare histological subtype adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. They find that CRP level can be seen as an additional independent prognostic parameter in patients with the rare histological subtype adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix 11 . CRP/Alb was convenient for testing in clinical laboratories 18 , and it was a sensitive, reliable convenient and a low-cost prognostic marker in cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barbara analysed prognostic value of serum CRP in rare histological subtype adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. They find that CRP level can be seen as an additional independent prognostic parameter in patients with the rare histological subtype adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix 11 . CRP/Alb was convenient for testing in clinical laboratories 18 , and it was a sensitive, reliable convenient and a low-cost prognostic marker in cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…C-reactive protein albumin (CRP) test is great significance in the early diagnosis, differential diagnosis and observation of curative effects. Suyang Guo et al aslo confirmed the role of CRP in the early diagnosis of cervical cancer recurrence 11 . Several nutrition-based and (or) inflammatory factors have been applied to predict the survival time in many cancers, such as neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) 12 , platelet/ lymphocyte ratio (PLR) 16 , C-reactive protein albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio 13 , modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) 14 , prognostic index (PI) 12 and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) 15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies have revealed that tumor microenvironment with bone marrow derived proinflammatory cells, such as neutrophils, can promote cancer progression through an increased expression of inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, but also adversely affect response to therapy. [17][18][19] As many studies have found, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), 20 albumin level, 21 c-reactive protein (CRP) level 22 and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) 23 may also predict the outcome for LACC patients who receive CRT plus IGABT. Additionally, the current hypothesis is that radiotherapy failure is related to increased levels of myeloid-derived suppressor cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis and prognosis marker became the main research tendency due to the recurrence rate of cervical cancer. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor [19], C-reactive protein [20], the ratio of serum angiopoietin-1 to angiopoietin-2 [21], and serum protein TKT, human fibrinogen FGA, metabolism-related protein [22], all of these can be a reliable marker for clinical treatment. Similarly, Lon peptidase 2 can be a potential therapeutic target, regulating oxidative damage and peroxidosome homeostasis, changing the proliferation and invasion of cancer cells [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%