2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-intermediate risk endometrial cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous multivariate analyses have revealed that positive peritoneal cytology could predict relapse and tumor-related death in early-stage EC [19][20][21][22][23]. However, other studies found that, in low-risk patients with EC, positive peritoneal cytology did not affect the 5year disease-free survival rate [24,25]. Positive peritoneal cytology has also previously shown no effects on overall survival or disease-free survival in patients with low-or intermediate-risk disease [26,27].…”
Section: Journal Of Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous multivariate analyses have revealed that positive peritoneal cytology could predict relapse and tumor-related death in early-stage EC [19][20][21][22][23]. However, other studies found that, in low-risk patients with EC, positive peritoneal cytology did not affect the 5year disease-free survival rate [24,25]. Positive peritoneal cytology has also previously shown no effects on overall survival or disease-free survival in patients with low-or intermediate-risk disease [26,27].…”
Section: Journal Of Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10] However, since the publication of the revised 2009 FIGO staging criteria, only one study has shown that positive peritoneal cytology is not a high-risk factor for prognosis. 10 In 2017, Scott et al, 10 have analyzed 668 patients with stage I EC, and shown that patients with positive peritoneal cytology have inferior OS and DFS compared with the subjects with negative cytology. However, after other confounding factors in the multivariable Cox model were adjusted, there was no longer a significant association between the peritoneal cytology and outcome.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No clear explanation or rationale has been offered in the new staging system to explain the continuous request to collect cytology although its results do not affect clinical care. 4 Although a limited number of articles have suggested that positive cytology is not an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes, [5][6][7][8][9][10] recent studies have repeatedly emphasized that positive peritoneal cytology is still associated with poor prognosis, even when other confounding factors are adjusted. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] The prognostic value of peritoneal cytology in EC patients remains controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of evidence was therefore downgraded from high to moderate. Furthermore, because of this lack of precision and the variable clinical significance, it was decided to form a conditional (weak) recommendation [5].…”
Section: Regarding "5-millimeter Trocar Site Hernias After Laparoscopmentioning
confidence: 99%