2000
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic significance of peri-operative blood transfusion following radical resection for oesophageal carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also showed that natural killer cell activity remained higher in the autologous group (p < 0.05) and suggested this as a possible mechanism influencing survival [10]. Furthermore, there is evidence that the increased risk for both infection [5] and disease recurrence [61][62][63] is dose related, with the increased risk of recurrence starting at a threshold of 3-4 units of allogeneic blood transfusion, depending on tumour type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also showed that natural killer cell activity remained higher in the autologous group (p < 0.05) and suggested this as a possible mechanism influencing survival [10]. Furthermore, there is evidence that the increased risk for both infection [5] and disease recurrence [61][62][63] is dose related, with the increased risk of recurrence starting at a threshold of 3-4 units of allogeneic blood transfusion, depending on tumour type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more frequent use of transhiatal over transthoracic esophagectomy in elderly patients may also have contributed to the low cardiopulmonary-related mortality [13] . Moreover, shorter operative time, reduced blood loss and fewer perioperative blood transfusion in recent years may all have important impact on the reduced incidence of cardiopulmonary complications during this period [14][15][16][17] . Finally, there has been considerable improvement in postoperative pain control by epidural anesthesia block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 -12 Decreased survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma who have received an allogenic blood transfusion have been reported previously. [13][14][15][16] In the current study, univariate analysis demonstrated that the survival rates of patients who received an allogenic blood transfusion were significantly more unfavorable compared with those of patients who did not receive a blood transfusion. However, there was a significantly higher proportion of more advanced disease in transfused patients compared with patients who did not receive a transfusion, perhaps because intraoperative blood transfusion was required more frequently when more difficult surgical manipulation was required to dissect the advanced tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…9 -12 With regard to esophageal carcinoma, decreased survival in patients undergoing allogenic blood transfusion has been reported in some studies. [13][14][15][16] However, to our knowledge the significance of allogenic blood transfusion in the prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma, which has been accepted as having more malignant potential compared with neoplasms in other organs, remains controversial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%