Summary:Busulfan (BU) is included in many conditioning protocols for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Pharmacokinetic parameters in individual patients have been related to short-term toxicity and risk of relapse after HSCT. In a series of 11 patients receiving the usual 16 Ă 1 mg/kg schedule over 4 days, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of replacing one dose with an intravenous formulation (BU in DMSO) which we had previously investigated in dogs. A dose of 0.5-0.6 mg/kg was used. No acute side-effects of BU/DMSO infusions administered over 1 h were observed. Bioavailability of BU powder capsules was on average 70% (range, 44-94%). Interindividual variability of the resulting AUC after intravenous doses was still substantial. Further studies are under way to define the possible role of BU/DMSO infusions in conditioning before HSCT. Keywords: busulfan; dimethylsulphoxide; pharmacokinetics; bioavailability Oral busulfan (BU) is used in many conditioning protocols before HSCT. The oral bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of BU have been notoriously variable. Furthermore, a correlation between plasma levels and toxicity, in particular veno-occlusive disease (VOD) of the liver has been reported, 1 and a recent study found an inverse correlation between plasma levels and probability of relapse in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. 2 Variations in levels both intrapatient and interpatient, are thought to depend to a large extent on differences in the bioavailability of the oral preparation of BU. An intravenous preparation of BU should overcome these problems at a dose corresponding to that estimated to be the bioavailability of the oral preparation.We previously reported pharmacokinetic data on a water soluble form of BU prepared in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) administered to dogs. 3 Since then clinical pilot studies using small doses of BU administered i.v. have been reported. However, no study has been conducted using doses of BU as required in the setting of HSCT. This, however, is necessary to determine the actual bioavailability of the drug given at those doses.For ethical reasons, a classical phase I dose escalation of BU/DMSO is not feasible in the setting of conditioning. Transplantation is always used with curative intent and considering the success rate with oral BU, low dose i.v. administration would not be acceptable. Therefore we chose a different strategy: we designed a protocol in which only one of the customary 16 oral doses of BU would be replaced by an i.v. preparation at a dose corresponding to that estimated to be the bioavailability of the oral preparation.Aims of the present study were to define actual BU bioavailability in the high-dose regimen and to identify possible toxicities that might be associated with single intravenous doses.
Materials and methodsFor the usual 4-day schedule of 4 Ă 1 mg BU/kg/day in preparation for HSCT, we decided to replace one dose with our i.v. formulation. The starting dose was derived from our previous study, 4 in which we measured the are...