1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-74643-7_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Chromosome Analysis in De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic significance of cytogenetics is therefore important to evaluate. Several studies have shown that survival, in treated AML patients, significantly decreased when, respectively, normal metaphases only (NN), and admixture of normal and abnormal metaphases (AN) and abnormal metaphases only (AA) (Berger et al, 198 7b;FIWCL, 1984;Lindquist et al 1988;Weh et al, 1988) were present. Recent reports have focussed on the prognostic value associated with recurring 'specific' chromosome rearrangements found in AML (FIWCL, 1987;Berger et d, 1987b;Keating et al, 1988;Schiffer et al, 1989;Bloomfield, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prognostic significance of cytogenetics is therefore important to evaluate. Several studies have shown that survival, in treated AML patients, significantly decreased when, respectively, normal metaphases only (NN), and admixture of normal and abnormal metaphases (AN) and abnormal metaphases only (AA) (Berger et al, 198 7b;FIWCL, 1984;Lindquist et al 1988;Weh et al, 1988) were present. Recent reports have focussed on the prognostic value associated with recurring 'specific' chromosome rearrangements found in AML (FIWCL, 1987;Berger et d, 1987b;Keating et al, 1988;Schiffer et al, 1989;Bloomfield, 1988).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sakurai & Sandberg first reported the influence of cytogenetics on outcome in AML. Recently, several large reports have attempted to determine more precisely the prognosis associated with each of the specific cytogenetic abnormalities encountered in AML (Berger et al 1987b;FIWCL, 1984: Keating et al, 1988Schiffer et al, 1989: Shirrington et al, 1988Weh et al 1988;Yashiga et al, 1988 found that inv 16, t(8;21) and t(15;17) were 'favourable' for response to therapy and/or remission duration, whereas patients with a normal karyotype had an intermediate prognosis and all the other karyotypic abnormalities carried a poor prognosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%