2009
DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2009.12.1.4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Basal Markers in Triple-negative Breast Cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other biomarkers including PgR, Ki67, p53 and EGFR also showed prognostic significance on univariate analysis, but were absorbed into ER in multivariate analysis. EGFR has recently received much attention as a therapeutic target in triple-negative disease, where it may have a role to play in older women (Tan et al , 2008; Kim et al , 2009; Lee et al , 2010). Further studies may give some insights into this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other biomarkers including PgR, Ki67, p53 and EGFR also showed prognostic significance on univariate analysis, but were absorbed into ER in multivariate analysis. EGFR has recently received much attention as a therapeutic target in triple-negative disease, where it may have a role to play in older women (Tan et al , 2008; Kim et al , 2009; Lee et al , 2010). Further studies may give some insights into this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With approximately 70–90% of triple-negatives revealed to be basal-like breast carcinomas [ 36 , 37 ], TNP has been frequently used as a surrogate for the basal-like subtype. However, despite considerable overlap in behavioral/biological characteristics, several studies have shown that triple-negative and basal-like breast tumors are not synonymous, differing in prognosis and possibly in chemotherapeutic sensitivity [ 12 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Furthermore, an all-negative definition has a high propensity to mis-assign tumor classifications when biomarkers are negative for technical reasons.…”
Section: Biomarker Panels For Basal-like Breast Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EGFR은 세포막에 존재하 며, 리간드와 결합하는 세포 외 영역, 친 지질성 세포막 영역, tyrosin kinase 활성이 있는 세포 내 영역으로 구성되어 있으며, 1 EGFR (ErbB1), Her2/neu (ErbB2), Her3 (ErbB3), Her4 (ErbB4) 등 4개의 비슷한 EGFR family 단백질에 속한다. 2,3 또한 EGFR은 폐암, 유방암, 대장암, 두경부 악성 종양, 난소 암, 방광암, 자궁경부암 등 다양한 악성 종양에서 발현이 증가되 는데, [4][5][6][7] 대장암에서 EGFR의 발현율은 25-77%로 연구자들에 따라 다양하며, 임상병리학적 의의 또한 상반된 결과가 많다. 8 이와 같은 다양한 결과는 EGFR 항체의 종류 및 실험 조건의 차이 그리고 대상 증례의 다양성으로 인해 발생할 뿐만 아니라, 동일한 실험 조건 내에서도 EGFR 염색의 양성 판독 기준에 의 해 많은 차이가 있을 수 있다.…”
Section: 대장암의 침습적 경계면에서 Egfr 발현의 임상병리학적 의의unclassified