“…Furthermore, we studied additional prognostic factors, such as age, cell type, hemoglobin level, histological grade, leukocytosis, NLR, PLR, SCCA level, thrombocytosis, tumor grade, and tumor volume. The above-mentioned results could be explained as follows: (1) The incidence of CC varies among different age-based groups, and the FIGO stage of CC also significantly differs among various age-based groups [ 2 ]; (2) Compared with squamous cell carcinoma, patients with adenocarcinoma may tend to have other extracervical spread, associating with a poor prognosis of CC patients [ 171 ]; (3) The hemoglobin level is significantly correlated to the tumor size and infiltrative phenotypes of tumors [ 172 , 173 ]; Moreover, the hemoglobin level may act as a surrogate marker of tumor hypoxia, which is significantly associated with resistance to radiotherapy [ 174 ]; (4) Histological grade, tumor grade, and tumor volume are significantly correlated to tumor extension and invasion, which may influence the prognosis of CC patients; (5) Leukocytosis in CC patients is associated with a poor prognosis, which may be related to a poor response to radiation therapy [ 100 ]; (6) Increased NLR is markedly associated with a large tumor size, advanced clinical stage, and positive LNI, resulting in shorter OS and EFS [ 15 ]; (7) Elevated PLR can induce inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, promoting the progression of cancer cells [ 175 ]; (8) Increased SCCA concentration can reflect the degree of cell proliferation for patients with CC [ 176 ]; and (9) Cancer treatment can induce thrombocytosis, cytokines or growth factors, receptors, and downstream effectors, playing an important role in the prognosis of CC [ 177 ].…”