2014
DOI: 10.4236/alc.2014.32007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Role of miR-205 in Early-Stage (T1N0) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…have shown that miR‐92a expression was an unfavorable prognostic marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, while the co‐expression of miR‐18a and miR‐92 as part of the miR‐17/92 cluster, also known as oncomiR‐1, was associated to worst prognostic outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma . Among other identified miRNAs, previous studies also reported that miR‐103 is an unfavorable prognostic factor for breast and colorectal cancer, while miR‐103 appears as a poor prognostic marker in endometrial and early stage non‐small‐cell lung cancer . In addition, expression of miR‐548b was noted to be an important indicator of good prognostic outcomes for Axl‐driven non‐small‐cell lung cancer …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have shown that miR‐92a expression was an unfavorable prognostic marker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, while the co‐expression of miR‐18a and miR‐92 as part of the miR‐17/92 cluster, also known as oncomiR‐1, was associated to worst prognostic outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma . Among other identified miRNAs, previous studies also reported that miR‐103 is an unfavorable prognostic factor for breast and colorectal cancer, while miR‐103 appears as a poor prognostic marker in endometrial and early stage non‐small‐cell lung cancer . In addition, expression of miR‐548b was noted to be an important indicator of good prognostic outcomes for Axl‐driven non‐small‐cell lung cancer …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%