2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04039-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic role of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in elderly HL: a two-center experience in 123 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calibration method and care of how this calibration is performed will affect the basic quantitative accuracy of PET scanner (17). Many recent studies have suggested that standardization of semiquantitative measurement may be superior to SUVmax in the prediction of treatment response and prognosis (22,23). Standardization in its most common form is a ratio of FDG uptake in tumors to that in normal background tissue, such as the liver and mediastinal blood pool (24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration method and care of how this calibration is performed will affect the basic quantitative accuracy of PET scanner (17). Many recent studies have suggested that standardization of semiquantitative measurement may be superior to SUVmax in the prediction of treatment response and prognosis (22,23). Standardization in its most common form is a ratio of FDG uptake in tumors to that in normal background tissue, such as the liver and mediastinal blood pool (24)(25)(26)(27)(28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The white blood cell count at diagnosis was >20×10 9 /l in 27 patients. The lactate dehydrogenase levels (>245 U/L) were high in 42 patients ( 19 ). Detailed characteristics of patients are presented in Table I .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since not all extramedullary sites are easily detectable, EMD may have been under-diagnosed. 18 F-FDG PET/CT is a sensitive imaging modality for diagnosing EMD in AL ( 7 , 19 ). Kumar et al ( 41 ) compared 18 F-FDG PET/CT and CT in terms of response and prognosis of patients with AML with EMD and found that PET/CT can identify more lesions and cases of metabolically progressive disease compared with CT alone, thus affecting management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite several positive results of SUV as prognostic factor in primary gastric DLBCL [ 16 ], SUV is for definition characterized by some factors that may affect their accuracy, like the uptake time between injection and imaging scan, the partial volume effect in case of small lesion, the risk of extravasation of administered radiotracer at the site of injection, the residual activity lost in the syringe, the decay of the injected activity and the technological features of the scanner, and acquisition and reconstruction parameters [ 17 ]. More recently, some variables indirectly expressing the volume-based metabolic disease, have emerged and seem to have a positive role in the evaluation of treatment response and outcome in different lymphoma [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. These parameters are MTV and TLG; additionally, in primary gastric DLBCL, some findings are available [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], but shared consensus is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%