“…However, despite several positive results of SUV as prognostic factor in primary gastric DLBCL [ 16 ], SUV is for definition characterized by some factors that may affect their accuracy, like the uptake time between injection and imaging scan, the partial volume effect in case of small lesion, the risk of extravasation of administered radiotracer at the site of injection, the residual activity lost in the syringe, the decay of the injected activity and the technological features of the scanner, and acquisition and reconstruction parameters [ 17 ]. More recently, some variables indirectly expressing the volume-based metabolic disease, have emerged and seem to have a positive role in the evaluation of treatment response and outcome in different lymphoma [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. These parameters are MTV and TLG; additionally, in primary gastric DLBCL, some findings are available [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], but shared consensus is lacking.…”